Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I know this is a tricky one to answer but would anyone know the ball park figure for a side return and loft extension?

SR is going to be about 25 square meters when finished - and only going out to side of house.

Loft will create two bedrooms and shower room.

I'm asking as we've had quotes from ?90k to ?175k, and I'd be interested to know which end of that scale is most realistic.

Thank you

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/48024-side-return-and-loft-extension/
Share on other sites

175 sounds over the top. we have had a few quotes for the same thing and reckon about 110 is a more realistic figure - but obviously each case/house is different and will throw up different issues. also we are only looking for a one bed/bath in the loft In the end we have decided not to do the side return - it's just too much cash for what you get and with the market a bit shaky there's a strong possibility you'd never see the money back. just my thoughts.


good luck

In my experience, for a side return on it's own you are looking at 60 for the build only and 100 in total when you add in new good spec kitchen, flooring, lighting, doors etc. All aspects can be done more cheaply but you risk the quality of the finish so if you have the budget then do it properly, we used Plus Rooms.


Loft conversions are a lot easier and you should prioritize a side return specialist as your builder.

We are currently looking at doing this and in the process of getting quotes however as we talk through what we want its easy to see how the spec adds thousands.


in terms of side extension we are looking at a similar design to http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-46134893.html


in terms of Loft we are looking at One bedroom, one study and separate shower room.



even still the spec within these structures can add thousands.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For me, it's get the builders to put the structure

> up and make it weatherproof then run with it from

> there doing what bits you can yourself / bringing

> tradesmen in.


There's probably something to be said for that approach. All too often the finish is rushed because the builders want to move onto the next job.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KidKruger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > For me, it's get the builders to put the

> structure

> > up and make it weatherproof then run with it

> from

> > there doing what bits you can yourself /

> bringing

> > tradesmen in.

>

> There's probably something to be said for that

> approach. All too often the finish is rushed

> because the builders want to move onto the next

> job.


In theory a good idea, but if there are problems going forward, it is nigh on impossible to get anyone to take responsibility, they always blame the other tradesmen.... We found this and ended up massively out of pocket and it cost twice as much to put right (this was even using a project manager who also passed the buck) - if we ever do work on a large scale again, we will use one firm to do everything...

if you can get the structure up, without having to worry about finishes, cabinet sizes etc. you can concentrate on that first phase with less distractions. Obviously there may be some items you need to have decided in front ie. if you're having underfloor drainage, where roughly the waste entry points will be.

mrcee Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks, certainly some food for thought and I am

> leaning towards getting structure including

> flooring in place 1st.


If you know a bit about building fair enough - but if not I'd recommend you use a builder who project manages and provides all of the other services as part of the initial quote, electrics plumbing etc. then he is responsible for them being available at the time they are needed.

mrcee - the link you've put up is the exact thing we're after!

I think it would be reassuring to hear from someone who's done a similar side return and loft extension, who could confirm that total cost was actually ?xxx amount.

It seems a daunting prospect to set out on this build without knowing what the final figure will be, and only have an estimate.

eek!

  • 2 weeks later...

I've done a loft and side return (at the same time).


The pure building costs for the extension will be circa 40k plus VAT and for the loft 45k plus VAT. So around 100k including VAT. However, to that you need to add all of the following:


? Measurement survey, engineering drawings, Thamses water fees, building control fees and Planning / certificate of lawfulness fees: 3k

? Architect fees: 12% of build costs if they project manage the build as well so 12k

? New Kitchen- 5k to 50k depending on what you want (12k for midrange with appliances)

? New flooring costs for extension and rest of kitchen: 750 to 2,500 depending on what you want

? Underfloor heating (if you want it): 2k

? Moving boiler / changing heating system to cope with larger house: 2k-4k

? New kitchen electrical fittings for kitchen: 1k to skies the limit depending on if you want LV lights, fancy chandeliers, how many sockets you want and what kind of finishing (chrome, flush, etc)

? Bifold doors and Velux windows (if you want them)?2k to 10k depending on what you want

? Flooring costs for new bedrooms and bathrooms and stairs: 2k to 6k depending on what you want

? New Bathroom suite- 1k to skies the limit

? Do you want to add in a ground floor bathroom under the stairs? Add 2k for that.

? Redoing your garden which will be wrecked?can be thousands!


All in 150k assuming you do nothing else to the house would be fair budget if it?s a mid market finish. It can easily be much more if you have expensive tastes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...