Jump to content

Road tax or ved for cyclists Stupid idea or what - Q: What do think ? do people like cyclists


Recommended Posts

Townleygreen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Doh!!!

> Don't be an idiot!

> Cycles do not emit any carbon.

> Cars that don't emit carbon (eg electric) don't pay any VED either.

> That's what the system is based on.


Currently, yes. But that hasn't always been the case. They do change the criteria every now and again.


And, if loads and loads of people switched to electric cars or bicycles tomorrow, guess what the Treasury would do? Slap the road tax on electric cars/bicycles.

I like people who are cyclists and cycle well, safely, courteously and thoughtfully, and are not a danger to me, other road users, or themselves.

Ditto I like people who ride motorcycles, drive cars, drive busses, taxis, etc as above.


I also quite like people who are pedestrians who choose to look before they cross the road and don't just wonder across whilst on their mobile phones.


Answer your question?

DFox, you are being sooooo short-sighted!


Having dedicated cycle lanes like in Holland etc will mean more people will want to cycle (and walk? as less polluted) so we will have more fit people who won't be such a drain on our NHS. Fewer obese people. Children will be able to ride safely to schools - so fewer cars on road at school times.


Less pollution as fewer cars. Fewer people suffering from allergies that result from this pollution.


What's not to like?

Children do not cycle to school and have very little desire to do so.

Walking would seem to be out of the question.


They get taken to school by their parents in their 4X4's


The subject of the thread is about whether there should be road tax for cyclists.

I suggested that they should contribute to the infrastructure hey demand.


Nothing to do with health or a drain on the NHS.


DulwichFox

Just shows how short-sighted you are then doesn't it Foxy!


If cycling is seen by parents and kids as safe then why wouldn't they be allowed to cycle? And everyone would benefit!


Can't you understand that?

registering cyclists is the last refuge of the mean-spirited, spiteful, and narrow minded


Cycling is something we should be encouraging from an early age, and for as long as possible (health, space, road capacity, ease of access etc)


for reasons of PHYSICS alone (and not ideology) driving cars shouldn't be encouraged


You "go through a register" for cyclists you drive more people away from that and more onto the road


Even as a selfish motorist, I wouldn't want more cars on the road

The original Q is a bit simplistic (other than as a way to make drivers more likely to accept cyclists as fellow road users, which is maybe the idea). Car drivers' road tax wouldn't cover the cost of roads: roads are mostly paid for by other forms of tax. As most cyclists are also tax payers, they are already contributing. And what about the cyclists who are also car owners - should they pay twice, when cycling would mean they're using the road less than if they relied on their car alone? If this is a serious proposition, would you extend it to make pedestrians pay road tax to cover the maintenance of pavements, pedestrian crossings, underpasses etc, which after all are for their sole use?

Lots of good info at: http://ipayroadtax.com , Natty.


Thinking more deeply about it. Bicycles don't even need the car-optimised, tax-funded road infrastructure that they are forced to use. They just have to use it because it took all the space up. So yeah, thanks motorists, for letting them use the car roads that we ALL have to pay for, despite not requiring.

tommyk2000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lots of good info at: http://ipayroadtax.com ,

> Natty.


That's the stupidest, most badly argued site I've seen in a while. Someone has spent a lot of time putting together a web site whining about a single casual piece of terminology.


What next? londondsareacodeisreally020.co.uk? mussolinididntmakethetrainsrunontime.it? youcantseethegreatwallofchinefromthemoon.com? duckquacksdoecho.tv?


Hopefully getalife.com might still be available.

tommyk2000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Let's not get heated. Here is an interesting

> video.

>

>




Nice video. I like the way it shows how different their response to traffic problems have been compared to the UK.

Loz Wrote:

> That's the stupidest, most badly argued site I've

> seen in a while. Someone has spent a lot of time

> putting together a web site whining about a single

> casual piece of terminology.

>

> What next? londondsareacodeisreally020.co.uk?

> mussolinididntmakethetrainsrunontime.it?

> youcantseethegreatwallofchinefromthemoon.com?

> duckquacksdoecho.tv?

>

> Hopefully getalife.com might still be available.




I think it's relevant, Loz. What's stupid about it? In fact, I think it contains most of the answers to the original question posed in this thread.


It is quite a problem really, and the terminology doesn't help. Some drivers use the excuse that they have paid to be on the road to justify treating cyclists badly. 'Get off my road, I pay to be here!' doesn't make sense. Really they just don't like bicycles being there, because they have to change their driving style.


I do feel like a hypocrite though. I am FURIOUS with the size of my NI and Tax contributions. These have to, in-part, pay for an NHS overburdened with obese motorists, respiratory diseases caused by emissions, RTA victims etc. 'Get out of my hospital, I pay to be here!'.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...