Jump to content

Whats, like , the worst film of all time ?


Recommended Posts

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm guessing 20,000 Days is vgrant hell, akin to

> sitting afixed, clockwork orange stylee, in an

> imax cinema showing endless youtube videos of cute

> cats.


I went to the Barbican showing last night (with Q&A and live performance) and frankly, everything about it was perfect.

Gerrard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Under the Skin - a second stinker in recent years

> from Scarlett Johansson


It's like a piece of coursework by a third-year student. Now it's on DVD, male viewers may be swayed by the opportunity to view a naked Scarlett Johansson frame by frame at their leisure, however.

The Hobbit was pretty dire, but mainly due to lack of pace and editing. I had to leave after thirty minutes. Even the lovable Martin Freeman's two-step reaction thing wasn't enough to keep me there.


All of the Harry Potters are pretty bad, redeemed only by the older (aka proper) actors. I appreciate that kind of filming is hard on a child actor though as it's all CGI, green screen and reaction shots. Not a fan of CGI generally.

ultraburner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Red Sonja and Conan the barbarian.



Nooooo - surely you don't mean the original Arnie Conan? A cracking film (and soundtrack) especially if you see the directors cut. Fantasy, suberb fighting scenes,giant snakes, James Earl Jones, one of the best movie musical scores ever, fantasy, tongue in cheek humour - ripping off head of vulture with his teeth, etc. etc.


The remake however, truly does suck!


HP

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Can't agree with this, some of them appear totally gormless and can't even look you in the eye or say a word when asked a straightforward question about the membership card at the till. The only cheerful person in there is Tom and he'll proactively talk to anyone about anything. That guy deserves more.
    • The person behind the till won't know about whether or not an assignment of their lease has been purchased by a company like Tesco.  Poundland was sold for a nominal fee so it's unsurprising that the location may close soon. As well, for what it's worth, someone working in the shop is likely to have their job impacted by the shop closing, so having loads of people going and asking them about the potential closing of their shop isn't really nice. "Hey, hear you'll be out of a job soon. Know much about that?" The best resource you all should be using for queries about planning details of new shops is the council's website. As was stated on the first page of this post, there's an application lodged for multiple changes at 29-35 Lordship Lane with the client as Tesco. They wouldn't lodge these plans unless it was happening, or at least extremely likely to happen.    The application is on the council's website here: https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?keyVal=SVW246KBKF500&activeTab=summary 
    • It's a notice about a licence, but the only name on it is Poundland.
    • What did the notice on the front door say? The planning applications currently being considered clearly refer to Tesco Stores Ltd.  The signage for above the entrance says "Tesco Express". I can't imagine the two companies combining in the same space 😉  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...