Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TLS/ANNASFIELD

> Great singing, but they are an odd looking bunch

> the 1960s liverpudlians.


Firstly, the "elf n safety" Czars wouldn't allow that today and yet I bet, almost as one, that everyone would want that to return.


Secondly, and here's your starter for "10" who is the Guy at 16 and 53 seconds swaying in the Middle of The 1964 Kop?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Will have another look at youtube tonight to check

> out the famous face - but I thought thay all

> looked like Shane McGowan.


Can't wait all night Mick!


Who is that good looking fokker?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Eh - is it you like, eh Ton?

> If its not you (and I don't know what you look

> like) I have not got a clue....


There was a clue as to this Liverpudlian Mick!.."fokker"....(?):))


I'm Sarf Londres Born 'n Bred---Elephant and Castle Brook Hospital-1954.B)

SimonM Wrote:

> Oh but how could you omit the divine Ms

> Goolagong?! :)


Indeed SimonM!...Evonne Goolagong Cawley defeated her fellow Australian and namesake Helen Cawley in the 1971 French Open Final..."not a lot of people know that" :)

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Eh - is it you like, eh Ton?

> > If its not you (and I don't know what you look

> > like) I have not got a clue....

>

> There was a clue as to this Liverpudlian

> Mick!.."fokker"....(?):))

>

> I'm Sarf Londres Born 'n Bred---Elephant and

> Castle Brook Hospital-1954.B)



You have completeley lost me with the "Fokker" clue TLS - Sorry - can anyone else help.


1954! - gosh that's old...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.”
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...