Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've just read that Ryan Babel is the joint laziest player in the Premiership - he has only made 5 tackles all season.


I wonder what Real Madrid will make of the Kop, hopefully they will be a state of shock and incapable of stringing any passes together when they hear YNWA!


However, with the 2nd leg being only 3 days after the Reds crunch visit to Old Trafford, I think Liverpool need to avoid defeat in Madrid as Liverpool aren't too clever when trailing from a 1st leg. I can only think of 2 European games, post-Heysel, where Liverpool have lost the 1st leg and still made it through to next round. I recollect those games as Auxerre (1991) and Chelsea (2007).

Bit disappointed to see on SSN this morning that Eduardo has done an exclusive with the scum.


No doubt they've put their usual own spin on the story, but to chastise Taylor for not apologising (when he states that he has tried on several occassions) is a bit harsh in my opinion.

Agreed Anna - it's disappointing. But having done the deal we can probably ignore the article itself as Eduardo's presence merely allows them to print the story they had already written


I know saying one hates the Sun is redundant - but god I hate it

In the Cardiff game Eduardo did a studs showing high challenge that went unpunished - and Setanta's resident muppet Craig Burley palmed it all off with Eduardo will want to defend himself after his injury. What about Bendtner's late lunge, at end of match - again should have been a straight Red card but he didn't even get a booking. Arsenal are as guilty as most when it comes to lunatic challenges and yet Wenger never says any of his boys did it deliberately or should never play again. I like Wenger a lot, he is a great coach, loves football, and is very articulate but sometimes he is such a two faced b'stard!

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Didn't Taylor go and see him in the hospital the

> very night it happened, or maybe the day after?

> That is ridiculous, especially when they rate Roy

> Keane so highly even though he admits to going out

> to hurt someone (who's career was ended).


That's not true actually Keef:


H?land retired through injury in 2002, although he claimed on his website that this was not caused by Keane's tackle.


Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alf_Inge_Haaland

I think that Roy Keane tackle on H?land was cowardly - and if any player ever deserved a life long ban it was Roy Keane. It was a totally disproportionate pre-meditated revenge assault - but that's Roy Keane for you, Manchester United to the bone.
Wish I'd never mentioned it now. Yes I think Keane is am individual is a nasty nasty piece of work, however good a player he was. Didn't want to start another your team is nasty arguement though. SP, fair enough, I didn't know that, but it still doesn't exactly excuse the thugs behaviour.

Roy Keane may explain his thuggish behaviour* as the result of Alf-Inge Haaland sneering over him when he got a serious injury at Elland Road - what Keane may have forgotten is the injury at Elland Road was caused by a miss timed tackle from behind on Haarland which Haarland may have considered to have been an attempt to break his legs.


*

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LFC = no backbone = no title (again)

>

> ''Matthew123 is cracking up, is cracking up...''



He he - great argument that. :-S


When you say Gerard SP, do you mean Houllier? Because as a player I'd pick Keane over Gerard too. ;-)

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > LFC = no backbone = no title (again)

> >

> > ''Matthew123 is cracking up, is cracking

> up...''

>

>

> He he - great argument that. :-S

>

> When you say Gerard SP, do you mean Houllier?

> Because as a player I'd pick Keane over Gerard

> too. ;-)



Hmm, I dropped an 'r' somewhere.


Matthew, I'm not sure what I'm supposed to have a chip on my shoulder about?

Annasfield, I usually come in peace, but make no apologies for replying to anti-Utd posts.

I don't always have the time for a full in-depth critique response, hence the 'punchy' replies.

3-0 tonight, did you expect me to say anything else ;-)...



Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yet another well thought out response. Would you

> like to discuss football or just sling mud red

> devil?

>

> Any predictions for tonight anybody?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...