Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've just read that Ryan Babel is the joint laziest player in the Premiership - he has only made 5 tackles all season.


I wonder what Real Madrid will make of the Kop, hopefully they will be a state of shock and incapable of stringing any passes together when they hear YNWA!


However, with the 2nd leg being only 3 days after the Reds crunch visit to Old Trafford, I think Liverpool need to avoid defeat in Madrid as Liverpool aren't too clever when trailing from a 1st leg. I can only think of 2 European games, post-Heysel, where Liverpool have lost the 1st leg and still made it through to next round. I recollect those games as Auxerre (1991) and Chelsea (2007).

Bit disappointed to see on SSN this morning that Eduardo has done an exclusive with the scum.


No doubt they've put their usual own spin on the story, but to chastise Taylor for not apologising (when he states that he has tried on several occassions) is a bit harsh in my opinion.

Agreed Anna - it's disappointing. But having done the deal we can probably ignore the article itself as Eduardo's presence merely allows them to print the story they had already written


I know saying one hates the Sun is redundant - but god I hate it

In the Cardiff game Eduardo did a studs showing high challenge that went unpunished - and Setanta's resident muppet Craig Burley palmed it all off with Eduardo will want to defend himself after his injury. What about Bendtner's late lunge, at end of match - again should have been a straight Red card but he didn't even get a booking. Arsenal are as guilty as most when it comes to lunatic challenges and yet Wenger never says any of his boys did it deliberately or should never play again. I like Wenger a lot, he is a great coach, loves football, and is very articulate but sometimes he is such a two faced b'stard!

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Didn't Taylor go and see him in the hospital the

> very night it happened, or maybe the day after?

> That is ridiculous, especially when they rate Roy

> Keane so highly even though he admits to going out

> to hurt someone (who's career was ended).


That's not true actually Keef:


H?land retired through injury in 2002, although he claimed on his website that this was not caused by Keane's tackle.


Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alf_Inge_Haaland

I think that Roy Keane tackle on H?land was cowardly - and if any player ever deserved a life long ban it was Roy Keane. It was a totally disproportionate pre-meditated revenge assault - but that's Roy Keane for you, Manchester United to the bone.
Wish I'd never mentioned it now. Yes I think Keane is am individual is a nasty nasty piece of work, however good a player he was. Didn't want to start another your team is nasty arguement though. SP, fair enough, I didn't know that, but it still doesn't exactly excuse the thugs behaviour.

Roy Keane may explain his thuggish behaviour* as the result of Alf-Inge Haaland sneering over him when he got a serious injury at Elland Road - what Keane may have forgotten is the injury at Elland Road was caused by a miss timed tackle from behind on Haarland which Haarland may have considered to have been an attempt to break his legs.


*

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LFC = no backbone = no title (again)

>

> ''Matthew123 is cracking up, is cracking up...''



He he - great argument that. :-S


When you say Gerard SP, do you mean Houllier? Because as a player I'd pick Keane over Gerard too. ;-)

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > LFC = no backbone = no title (again)

> >

> > ''Matthew123 is cracking up, is cracking

> up...''

>

>

> He he - great argument that. :-S

>

> When you say Gerard SP, do you mean Houllier?

> Because as a player I'd pick Keane over Gerard

> too. ;-)



Hmm, I dropped an 'r' somewhere.


Matthew, I'm not sure what I'm supposed to have a chip on my shoulder about?

Annasfield, I usually come in peace, but make no apologies for replying to anti-Utd posts.

I don't always have the time for a full in-depth critique response, hence the 'punchy' replies.

3-0 tonight, did you expect me to say anything else ;-)...



Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yet another well thought out response. Would you

> like to discuss football or just sling mud red

> devil?

>

> Any predictions for tonight anybody?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
    • I'd quit this thread, let those who just want to slag Labour off have their own thread.  Your views on the economy are worth debating.  I'm just stunned how there wasn't this level of noise with the last government.  I could try to get some dirt on Badenoch but she is pointless  Whilst I am not a fan of the Daily Mirror at least there is some respite from Labour bashing. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/grenfell-hillsborough-families-make-powerful-36175862 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-facing-parliamentary-investigation-36188612  
    • That is a bit cake and eat it tho, isn’t it?    At what point do we stop respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs  because history shows us we sometimes simply have no other choice  you are holding some comfort blanket that allows you to believe we are all equal and all valid and we can simply voice different options - without that ever  impacting on the real world  Were the racists we fought in previous generations different? Were their beliefs patronised by the elites of the time? Or do we learn lessons and avoid mistakes of the past?   racists/bigots having “just as much to say” is both true and yet, a thing we have learnt from the past. The lesson was not “ooh let’s hear them out. They sound interesting and valid and as worthy of an audience as people who hold the opposite opinion” 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...