Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Was what Rafa said really a rant?? I thought he was cool, calm & collected, and not far wide of the mark, just foolish enough to say it at the wrong time as far as his club are concerned, but he had some fair points. He should have left it until the end of the season though, but there you go. You couldn't call it a rant as it was delivered in a venonomous, ranting way.
Sorry, but what the fuck is The Liverpool Way? I hate sayings like that, Liverpool fans like any other fans want to watch good footy and win stuff. Neither Rafa or Jose play particularly exciting football, but that would be quickly forgiven if a league title landed at Anfield. Frankly, I think the fans would soon forget loyalty to Rafa if Jose came and delivered a title.

Haha, long time since I seen that clip.. and remarkably some of the Liverpool actors actually did pass for John Barnes, Ronnie Whelan and Nicky Tanner


There is only one Liverpool way, and that is winning the title... everything else is a bonus... otherwise we'd have chugged along with Roy Evans for the last 15 years. I like Rafa, I think he is nice guy, hence why likes of Mourinho, Ferguson, Honest 'Arry and Big Sam have fallen out with him big time.

I wonder,.....what do you think the world and his wife would have said, and how would the media have eracted if Fergie ahd said exactly the same things. I think it would have been something like "good old fergie, still playing his mind games" but because it's not him, it's seen as someone losing the plot. Strange that, don't you think?
Not really. Fergie wouldn't have been reading from a list for a start. As has been discussed here before Fergie never uses the M word, Rafa did, which made everyone go on about it. Then his team (or possibly his selection policy) let him down so the rant/tirade/set of calm observations made him look like he was unstable. According to you lot Fergie is an unstable, ranting alcoholic already. :))

Well it's only predictable because I always look at the record books before I make big statements ;-)


Ferguson has been at Old Trafford something like 23 years - he has won 2 European Cups and 10 titles. Uncle Bob was in charge at Anfield for 9 years and won 3 European Cups and 6 titles. Bob also came out of retirement in 1985/86 and helped Kenny win the Double.


Bob's strike rate, whilst Manager, was 0.66 on Titles and 0.33 on European Cups - Ferguson has a 0.43 Title ratio and 0.087 hit on European Cups. In other words Bob's Title record is 50% better again than Ferguson, and in European Cups it's almost 4 times better.

...quick, someone get on the phone to Jose and let him know that if he quits after winning the Scudetto this season he'll have a 100% record making him officially* the best football manager Italy has ever known - he truly is 'The Special One'!..


*according to the record books

Mourinho is a great Manager, but I'd hardly say 1 season in Italy is worthy of such an accolade...


However a 66% strike rate truly is excellent, so I guess that puts him somewhere between Paisley and Ferguson (when you remember Bob has a better European Cup record)..

You also don't take into account that it's harder to win the European cup/Champions League these days. ;-) More games (both domestic and European), more travelling, more variation of teams styles and higher fitness levels.


Not that I am biased but I think the achievements of Fergie (cuddly uncle Fergie!) at Aberdeen was extraordinary and is worthy of admiration no matter what you think of him in later life. That puts him up there with the very, very best.

Well Rafa has got 3 Champions League semi-finals in 4 seasons, and two of those he reached the final, but does that make him a better Manager than Paisley? Of course not. The Champions League may be more difficult but back in Paisley's day the domestic competition was harder than it is today.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...