Jump to content

Recommended Posts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The silence is deafening...;-)

>

>

> Sandperson Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Haven't seen the highlights yet but according

> to

> > the radio commentary Ronaldo made a lot of it

> but

> > it was red card. Suprise, suprise Matthew

> hasn't

> > been on yet talking about the injustices of

> > referees decisions towards United. Now, where's

> > that flying pig?

> >

> > Good result last night and still on course for

> the

> > league so that's nice. All the other stuff is

> just

> > gravy!


I only saw the 2nd half, and tbh I was more disgusted in the quality of the Guinness than the play acting of Ronaldo.

Parker's histrionics were pathetic. He was trying to get the other player sent off rolling around as if he'd been shot.


Tottenham were superb last night. I really thought that Boro could have been another banana skin as they had suddenly struck form with a couple of good results including beating Liverpool 2-0. Great to see Robbie Keane back in form and scoring and creating goals again.

I'd be very surprised if Aaron Lennon isn't picked in the next England squad, whenever he gets the ball people are up on their feet in anticipation that something good is going to happen and this season usually does.


Quids you're right. Newcastle are looking in seriously deep shit.

If I recollect correctly, Liverpool wanted to re-sign Owen for the same amount they'd sold him to Real Madrid. All that was blown out of the water when Newcastle came in with their crazy ?17m offer. With transfer deadline loomimg, Liverpool advised Owen to reject the Newcastle offer as Real Madrid would crumble and agree to the Liverpool deal once Owen made it clear it was only Liverpool he would join. Whether Real Madrid would have budged in another matter but what is clear is that Owen would have been better sitting it out in Spain rather than exposing his sensitive hamstrings to the crippling North Sea wind.

Ranger's result reminded me of the Sun headline when Caley beat Celtic...


'Super Caley go balistic,

Celtic are atrocious'...



Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nice to see proper order restored north of the

> border last night, that's the main thing, am

> expecting Paddy Power to pay out on Celtic soon,

> we let Gers back into it, but they messed it up,

> that won't happen again.

After Liverpool drew at Stoke in early January, and Liverpool 4 points clear Rafa rallied his players for the run in to the title with this comment to the media: -


?It could be that it takes fewer points to win the title because you can lose games you expect to win. This could be the situation at the end of the season.?

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ranger's result reminded me of the Sun headline

> when Caley beat Celtic...

>

> 'Super Caley go balistic,

> Celtic are atrocious'...

>

>

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> -


That headline meant the end of john barnes and his replacement was martin o neill so that loss was a real positive for celtic. But yes it was a great headline..

Back to a day when the fan's had wit. My, slightly bias, example....on a banner (sheet on two broom poles) at the 1980 Cup Final "Devonshire Cream, Rice Pudding"



For anyone under 40, Alan Devonshire=West Ham genius, Pat Rice=Arsenal donkey...


*takes off jumper ready for goalpost

At the 1992 Semi Final at Villa Park (Replay)


Have Souness' Men got the Heart to Bypass Pompey?


Sadly they did but it made me laugh, as did a big pink inflatable pig thrown over the fence into the scousers in the shared Holte end on which someone had magic markered "Jan Molby"

I remeber on fantasy football league some years ago there was a sing in honour of the early german exit. Went something like - we wanted to play like Muller, Beckenbaur, Rumenigge... but instead we played like Kuntz!


Was to the tune of Nessum Dorma if anyone's interested.



















I'll ge me coat.....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...