Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeez, you are boring. For about two posts there I

> thought your login had been hijacked but it turns

> out you are back to your old self.



Not as boring as you getting all high and mighty when the forces of darkness are linked with diving, especially as the players I've mentioned were or are the best exponents on the planet. If you can't take the heat, piss off out the kitchen. >:D< Oh by the way I've discovered emocions.

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://wwwdelivery.superstock.com/WI/223/1560/Prev

> iewComp/SuperStock_1560R-2019812.jpg



Marks for Gerrards dive at Anfield last season in CMPL when the opposition defender had the temerity to look at him in a nasty way. They broke the mould when they made the likes of Frank McClintock, Tony Adams, Steve Bould and Keown (he's got a monkeys head)

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What charming language Atila. Matt, that list is

> hilarious, no Torres or Van Persie? And surely

> Pires counts for two he was so bad. ::o



No, I think horse face Van Nistleroy counts as 10 as he was the biggest cheating c**nt that ever played in the prem, Van Persie, yeah right. Should have gone to spec savers.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Charmed again AG.

>

> What about Andy Johnson? Bergkamp struggled to

> stay on his feet as did Overmars.



Does talking bollocks come naturally to you or do you take lessons? As the overwhelming evidence on this forum proves, the majority of opinion points the finger at your players past and present being exponents of the double twist back flip with pike. Bergkamp and overmars struggled to stay on their feet becaiue they were constantly being hacked over by "good honest, professionl" journeymen who couldn't play football properly if their wretched lives depended on it. I love the comments most pundits come out with when Scholes (regularly) scythes someone down, "He can't tackle can he", well don't fcuking try then you ginger knob, if you're going to potentially injure someone!!!

Yes Pires was a diving cheat but you cannot put him in the same bracket as Ronaldo... but of course the undoubted master of diving in the box was Ruud Van Nistlerooy. No one, not even Ronaldo can touch the Dutchman. Ahh I forgot Teddy Sheringham.. now there was a player who had no shame in the box although most of his dirtiest work at Spurs.


We all know there are individuals who cheat and it's difficult to pin the blame on the Club they play for but when you have half a team of players who dive outside the box (rather than make a pass) because they have a master craftsman free kick taker then that is an entirely new level of cheating. I don't want to point any fingers here but not so many years ago the Club in question would have it's players manufacture 50-50 challenges on edge of opposition box so they could vault 2 footed in the air to try and win a free kick - they usually got the free kicks but this tactic suddenly disappeared circa 2003.

Oh, this is a suprise. I really thought I was going to get a well balanced opinion from you Matt.....not. What a shame you've stuck your blinkers on again so soon after the beginning of the season. I guess it's all downhill from here. :( Of course the only way we ever win games is by diving AND we send our scouts out looking for the best divers in the world. you two just crack me up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The stop outside the chippy was still closed earlier today, although the barriers I saw yesterday have been removed, so no need for the closure.  The stop outside the church across the road is now uncovered and open
    • You all have different and conflicting interests though. It isn't necessarily appropriate for him to communicate with all of you at the same time about the same issues.    You're giving more away with each post as to how these difficulties probably arose. 
    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...