Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Absolutely. Name is on the tin after all.

Then we wouldn have lost the supposedly worthless cup winners cup, which amazingly should be for cup winners.


I guess it boils down to is modern football a sport or money generating entertainment.


That was a rhetorical question obviously, I'm clearly naive, old fashioned and out of touch; post cronje, bloodgate and now piquet juniour, no sport is sacred.

I see Del Boy Trotter, sorry, Harry Redknapp has accused some of the Arsenal fans at least weeks game with Citeh as being nutters and idiots for their reaction to Adebayors goal celebration, and for their goading and taunting of him. Fair enough. One would hope that as he is so quick to pass his verdict on these buffoons, he will also be as quick to tar the idiots who verbally abuse Sol Campbell with nasty homophobic shit everytime he turns up at shite hart lane with the same brush.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Touche.


Fair enough, so all the crap that Sol gets is not the product of "nutters and idiots" but cleary the spoutings of intelligent, articulate and well read erudite chaps. The fact that he gets a bit of racist shite as well means they must challenge Einstein on the brain power front. As for the jowly one, he himself has not been averse to argy bargy on the touchline over the years. Pot and Kettle. Should keep his attention on his own backyard.

Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Touche.

>

> Fair enough, so all the crap that Sol gets is not

> the product of "nutters and idiots" but cleary the

> spoutings of intelligent, articulate and well

> read erudite chaps. The fact that he gets a bit of

> racist shite as well means they must challenge

> Einstein on the brain power front. As for the

> jowly one, he himself has not been averse to argy

> bargy on the touchline over the years. Pot and

> Kettle. Should keep his attention on his own

> backyard.


FFS I'm not condoning it. I think it was disgusting that he had to put up with THAT song. But lots of fans like to taunt ex-players. Adeboyer brought it in himself and I think he's very lucky not to have got a longer ban considering the kick in the face he gave to Van Persie.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Jah Lush Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Touche.

> >

> > Fair enough, so all the crap that Sol gets is

> not

> > the product of "nutters and idiots" but cleary

> the

> > spoutings of intelligent, articulate and well

> > read erudite chaps. The fact that he gets a bit

> of

> > racist shite as well means they must challenge

> > Einstein on the brain power front. As for the

> > jowly one, he himself has not been averse to

> argy

> > bargy on the touchline over the years. Pot and

> > Kettle. Should keep his attention on his own

> > backyard.

>

> FFS I'm not condoning it. I think it was

> disgusting that he had to put up with THAT song.

> But lots of fans like to taunt ex-players.

> Adeboyer brought it in himself and I think he's

> very lucky not to have got a longer ban

> considering the kick in the face he gave to Van

> Persie.


FFS I didn't suggest that you were condoning it, just that Del boy Redknapp is a hypocrite and needs to look to correct the behaviour of his own supporters before opening his jowls to comment on oppositon supporters

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...