Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well Inter have just got stronger as the half has progressed and (to use one of Fergie's words) should have been rewarded with an equalizer. I'm sure United will come out 2nd half and look to get a killer goal within first few minutes otherwise it could start to get rather anxious at Old Trafford.


So that's my prediction, United to make it 2-0 within 5 minutes of re-start, otherwise Inter to win the tie..

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well so far so good for United, guess they'll want

> to score more though, would be a nightmare to be

> 1-0 up and then the away team equalise in the 90th

> minute...



Dream outcome for me that one, maybe a Ronaldo own goal....


Not going to happen now though is it?!

Dreadful game and performance by Arsenal indeed


However... I wouldn't read too much into that. In previous competitions those games where we have been oustatnding (5-1 in Milan for example) we often crash back to earth. And where we scrape through, we lift our game. I'm just glad we are through for now. I belive we will play Barcelona in this competition.. whether it is in next weeks draw or in the final I don't know but I have a feeling


On another note - it was quite sad to see Viera as a shadow of himself at Old Trafford last night

Viera was poor. Big heart from Eduardo though. I was just thinking as he walked up to take the pen how much he must be so happy that, even if he didn't score, he was in a position to take one at all. It didn't really matter that he missed, just good that he came back from such a horrible injury and could play again. :)-D
I have to say that on last nights performance, whoever we get in the next round will not be quaking in their boots. I hop e I'm wrong but we weren't convincing at all. But it was good to see that Eduardo had the balls to take the first pen, unlike a certian Mr. Gallas who seemed to be conspicuous by his absence, and fair play to young Theo who also didn't shirk the responsibility in a BIG away game. Bodes well for England and the Arsenal.

Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have to say that on last nights performance,

> whoever we get in the next round will not be

> quaking in their boots. I hop e I'm wrong but we

> weren't convincing at all. But it was good to see

> that Eduardo had the balls to take the first pen,

> unlike a certian Mr. Gallas who seemed to be

> conspicuous by his absence, and fair play to young

> Theo who also didn't shirk the responsibility in a

> BIG away game. Bodes well for England and the

> Arsenal.


I tuned in for the extra time and pens and wasn't sure if Gallas was playing! I thought I saw a close up of him sitting on the ground and his team mates trying to drag him onto his feet. Isn't it time he got a boot up the arse?

I never thought Gallas should have been made captain in the first place, for me it should have been either Kolo because of his work ethic, or Fab, or Robin. I don't think any of the others play for the shirt in the way that Henry, Adams, Vieira, Wright, Parlour, Dixon, Winterburn, Keown, even Pires, Lungberg, Gilberto, Cashley Hole knew what pride in the shirt meant. I'm not convinced that many of the present players do and that really, really, pisses me off.
I think the problem Wenger had with choosing a captain is a lack of experienced candidates. IMO Toure is the only one up to the task. Gallas's threat to Chelski, that he would go on strike if he wasn't allowed to leave, should've rang alarm bells with Wenger as to the type of personality he has. You also want a player that is committed to the club long term. Too many Arsenal players have talked about leaving if the club doesn't look like winning trophies. Fabregas only recently said if Wenger left he would too. Aren't players supposed to be playing for the club, period? It's no surprise that in your list Atila there are a lot of home grown players who understand what it means to pay for the club, and not just pick up a pay cheque at the end of the month. This applies to all clubs, not just Arsenal, but the problem is magnified at Arsenal due the lack of home grown players, or foreigners who have been there a long time. At Utd I hope Ronaldo will never be made captain because of what happened last summer, he basically can't be trusted to stay long term. Whereas Rooney is the opposite and should be a shoe-in for the job, once Neville/Giggs and later on Rio, retire.

very little true loyalty in the modern game.


Potts was the last true hammer, and we can't seem to hold onto our academy products sadly, else we'd be far and away the best team in the premiership.


In a moment of WATN: "In August 2007 Steve completed The Knowledge and qualified to drive a Hackney carriage." ?

"very little true loyalty in the modern game"


True, although maybe that's always been the case. From soccerhistory.org:


"In 1891 the Football League had 448 registered players, most of whom were part-time or full-time professionals. The Scots, on the other hand, remained steadfastly opposed to the introduction of professionalism until 1893. The most vocal opponents to its introduction were Queen's Park and the Scottish press, who regularly described footballers who were tempted south as "base mercenaries " or "traitorous wretches"

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Potts was the last true hammer, and we can't seem

> to hold onto our academy products sadly, else we'd

> be far and away the best team in the premiership.


So who exactly would be in this West Ham "best team in the premiership" XI !?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...