Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So why didn't you date the guy with the Aston

> Martin?

>

> Hell, even I would have been tempted.


Hmmm, not sure really. (I do sometimes kick myself a little)


Perhaps, I was holding out for one of these:


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9a/1963_Jaguar_XK-E_Roadster.jpg/800px-1963_Jaguar_XK-E_Roadster.jpg

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> charliecharlie Wrote:

>

> Impressive Car charliex2!


which one are you referring to TLS???


(yes, I know I should be working but I decided to take the day off... have been busting a gut since start of year)

andy&kez I also had a beetle, it was the noisiest most uncomfortable and dangerous car I ever had.


On motorways with the slightest crosswind it would jump into the next lane, and if you ever braked hard going down a


steepish hill you would spin 180 degrees. It did have good traction in snowy winters, but the rest of it you could keep.


I preferred the British beetle the Morris Minor, which was my first car and the only car I had with a split windscreen.

Love the old Beetle. My Uncle does them up for a living and I remember that every time we went to visit him, there'd be a different colour beetle on the drive way. Loved going down to the garage to see what he was working on. Everything came in as a wreck and went out looking pristine.


Tom's V Dubs


http://homepage.ntlworld.com/tomsvdubs/02.jpg

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> charliecharlie Wrote:

> which one are you referring to TLS???

>

> Particularly the one you bought for your

> birthday!

>

> Stylish and Classy..(tu)


I'll continue the conversation on my own then...


CC:"Stylish and Classy, you say?"


Me: "Absolutely!"


CC: "Why Thank You, Young Man!"


Me: "Don't mention it"


CC: "In that case, I won't(!)"...


At this point TLS slinks away, head bowed, having tried(and clearly failed miserably) to offer a Young Lady a compliment.:(

ops, sorry TLS, had to pop out and live life for a bit!!! slum dog millionaire (well worth seeing if you have not already)


thanks you for your fine compliments,

stylish and classy, you know how people say they are like their dogs... then maybe, just maybe, the same applies to people and their cars... hhmmmmm, stylish and classy... I like it (enough appreciation yet? let me know if you need more!) sweet dream CC

charliecharlie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ops, sorry TLS, had to pop out and live life for a

> bit!!! slum dog millionaire (well worth seeing if

> you have not already)


I might do that..;-)

>

> thanks you for your fine compliments,

> stylish and classy, you know how people say they

> are like their dogs


I wonder if I'm like my 4 little West Highland Terriers:)


stylish and classy... I like it (enough appreciation yet? let me know if you need more!)


Now you are spoiling me!


sweet dream CC


Hopefully I'll have more than one tonight.

Goodnight:-$

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I wonder if I'm like my 4 little West Highland

> Terriers:)



stranger than strange... I wonder if that means you've got 16 legs:X(!):-S and a tail>:D<

charliecharlie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:>

> > I wonder if I'm like my 4 little West Highland

> > Terriers:)>

> stranger than strange... I wonder if that means

> you've got 16 legs:X(!):-S and a tail>:D<


Well I know I've got a tail:))


Just putting their matching Red Jackets on to take them for a long walk as I'm off with friends for a Country Hike today, afterwards.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...