Jump to content

Recommended Posts

charliecharlie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> photoshop overload, touch up city, but still

> pretty eye catching in more than one or two or

> three ways...

>

> Thought you might have meant this one for a mo

> Moos, could he wear his trousers any lower??????

> Not so arty but quite cute none the less;-)


Hee hee, that photo might as well be captioned "I love myself". Fabulous.


I think it's the London Bridge rugby man's skin that's so lovely, he looks like a bronze statue.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And where are his clothes? If they're in a

> suitcase...


No! No! Don't mention this Guy in the context of wheely suitcases, I beseech you!


Honk reminds us that some people have negative views of Guys with suitcases with wheels who choose to carry them to prevent them making a noise...

Remember the old Italian BBQ's from 25 years ago when an Italian would get rejected by a Tourist at the long dining tables and many other Italians were convinced that the Girl or Women were up for it so just, literally, formed a queue until a Girl said "Yes!" to a Dance to one of them.

Very persistent....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
    • "PGC, do you reckon this 'Anderson -Tendulkar' series could make Tests a bit more interesting to the wider word?" Alas no. Until it comes back to terrestial telly, I think it will always suffer from elitism(?).  Excepting The Guardian, cricket is barely mentioned in other press. I am fortunate in that my daughter has just added me to her subscription on NOW TV. It has been great to watch this test; it really could have gone either way, eariler in the day, which always makes it more exciting. The only bugbear is that I am a TMS afficianado, and they are about eight deliveries ahead of the tv! I thought Tongue was excellent in mopping up the tailenders, and Duckett was a delight to watch. Bumrah and Jadeja were brilliant to see. I'm sure the Edgbaston crowd will have tremendous supporters for both sides. PS: I don't think Jofra will be back on the strength of one county wicket.
    • Why it a strange first post Sue?  We all have to start somewhere! These kids have created a situation where they have been very unpleasant. Surely their physical appearance etc is a key factor in identifying them?  I don’t understand. Are you defending these kids? 
    • I can do the research but are more people watching cricket on TV now it went to the higher bidder or in 05 when it was on Channel 4?  I think that less kids are into cricket since it went off terrestrial.  I suppose I should have had TMS on.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...