Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've got to agree with treehugger and Otta. This is gold dust (mind you any opinion I express at the moment has to be filtered through the understanding that I'm currently on quite strong painkillers).


The challenge now is to run with the concept.


I wonder how many remember the hypnotic opening sequence of the classic 1987 movie set in our (newly) twinned city of New Orleans starring Dennis Quaid and Ellen Barkin?


I think similar could be achieved using local musical talent and footage obtained by waving a mobile phone around on a balcony of the top floor of the Ladlands Estate. (Did I mention that the painkillers were strong?)

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not sure we are more precious. No-one in or

> out regards Dulwich Village as East Dulwich. And

> Thatcher's house in Hambledon Place, SE21, was

> most definitely not East Dulwich.


Maybe people were less obsessed with this kind of stuff in the 80s. Bits of New Cross used to be called Deptford *shrugs*

Last time I saw Easy D in Time Out it said this:


"Somehow, since the millennium, East Dulwich has gone from being a relaxed, vaguely bohemian secret to a caricature of middle-class urban living. The online East Dulwich Forum is one of the most active local area forums in the country, where people get hot under the collar about unsightly advertising hoardings, noise after 10pm, and whether chain shops are welcome (Waitrose only, it seems)"


Seemed to split opinion as I recall.


I wonder what they say about Claps J Town?

Too Good To Be True Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Somehow, since the millennium, East Dulwich has

> gone from being a relaxed, vaguely bohemian secret

> to a caricature of middle-class urban living. The

> online East Dulwich Forum is one of the most

> active local area forums in the country, where

> people get hot under the collar about unsightly

> advertising hoardings, noise after 10pm, and

> whether chain shops are welcome (Waitrose only, it seems)"


Sounds like a fair write-up TBH

At the turn of the millenium, it was a cheap(ish) neighbourhood which seemed to have a higher than average concentration of actors, artists, musicians, etc so "vaguely bohemian" isn't exactly the worst description I can think of. But by 2002, it already felt like an area in the grips of gentrification.

newboots Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This just makes me nostalgic for the days when

> Time Out was my most-looked-forward-to publication

> of the week :(



Me too. Time Out was once thrilling to read. Pre-Internet it was the only way to find out what was going on in London.

newboots Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This just makes me nostalgic for the days when

> Time Out was my most-looked-forward-to publication

> of the week :(


Or City Limits if you were a donkey-jacket-wearing leftie with a penchant for grim East European cinema...

Easy D isn't for Bohemians. It's for beautiful people with flowers in their hair who sit on beanbags proclaiming how working class they are and how we should all support the workers' co-operative run Iceland, before rushing off to Franklins or the like.


Easy D? To be followed by The Camber W and Honor O.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
    • Fernando came and sorted out our very overgrown garden.  He is a very friendly chap, works meticulously and charges very fair prices.   We’ve been using his Services for many years now and will continue to do so.    Here are his contact details if you have any gardening questions: Fernando - 07946 757938       
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...