Jump to content

No busses up Rye Lane

spanglysteve

By spanglysteve
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

indiepanda

indiepanda

Posted
Posted

TFL currently says:


RYE LANE, SE15: Bus routes 12, 37, 63, 78, 197, 343, 363 and P12 are subject to diversion and delays in both directions on Rye Lane, SE15 due to emergency roadworks. Buses are diverted northbound from Peckham Rye, right Copeland Road, left Consort Road, left Clayton Road, (routes 12 and 343 then go left Hanover Park, right Rye Lane and rejoin line of route) ahead Clayton Road and rejoins line of route. Buses are diverted southbound from Hanover Park, ahead Clayton Road, right Consort Road, right Heaton Road, left Peckham Rye and rejoins line of route.


From what Strawbs said it's going to last all week.

adsyb99

adsyb99

Posted
Posted

Thanks, appreciate that.


indiepanda Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TFL currently says:

>

> RYE LANE, SE15: Bus routes 12, 37, 63, 78, 197,

> 343, 363 and P12 are subject to diversion and

> delays in both directions on Rye Lane, SE15 due to

> emergency roadworks. Buses are diverted northbound

> from Peckham Rye, right Copeland Road, left

> Consort Road, left Clayton Road, (routes 12 and

> 343 then go left Hanover Park, right Rye Lane and

> rejoin line of route) ahead Clayton Road and

> rejoins line of route. Buses are diverted

> southbound from Hanover Park, ahead Clayton Road,

> right Consort Road, right Heaton Road, left

> Peckham Rye and rejoins line of route.

>

> From what Strawbs said it's going to last all

> week.

Blah Blah

Blah Blah

Posted
Posted
When I cycled down there last night, only a small section south side of Bournemouth Road junction was blocked off. It was kind of nice to experience half of Rye Lane without traffic and made me think that pedestrianising south of Bournmouth Road, and re-routing buses down Bournemouth and back round to meet Peckham Rye could work. Would be a great spot for a proper market too.
nunhead_man

nunhead_man

Posted
Posted

Yeah - me too


Now if the contractors had left a cycle lan as opposed to leaving us fighting it out with pedestrians I'd feel cyclists finally have a place in the heart of the construction industry - especially in their motor vehicle role in causing death and serious injury to cyclists - about 50% of cases?


Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When I cycled down there last night, only a small

> section south side of Bournemouth Road junction

> was blocked off. It was kind of nice to experience

> half of Rye Lane without traffic and made me think

> that pedestrianising south of Bournmouth Road, and

> re-routing buses down Bournemouth and back round

> to meet Peckham Rye could work.

buggie

buggie

Posted
Posted

nunhead_man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah - me too

>

> Now if the contractors had left a cycle lan as

> opposed to leaving us fighting it out with

> pedestrians I'd feel cyclists finally have a place

> in the heart of the construction industry

> -----


Having been a pedestrian "fighting it out" with cyclists through the Rye Lane roadworks the other day, my over riding feeling was get off you bike and push it for 100yrds.

I was not alone in having a small child with me and couldn't believe the callous & unthoughtful attitude of several cyclists who seemed to see it as a sport to weave around everyone regardless of anyone else - pretty disrespectful and ironic given how quickly most cyclists complain about the lack of respect their given with regard to their own safety.


Feel that some cyclists need to learn to treat others how they'd like to be treated themselves.

nunhead_man

nunhead_man

Posted
Posted

As I said buggie -


"Now if the contractors had left a cycle lane as opposed to leaving us fighting it out with pedestrians I'd feel cyclists finally have a place


So how about blaming the contractors not the cyclists?


Southwark KNOWS how many cyclists use that route in weekday am and pm - if not a lane why not a diversion?


buggie Wrote:

>

> Having been a pedestrian "fighting it out" with

> cyclists through the Rye Lane roadworks the other

> day, my over riding feeling was get off you bike

> and push it for 100yrds.

> I was not alone in having a small child with me

> and couldn't believe the callous & unthoughtful

> attitude of several cyclists who seemed to see it

> as a sport to weave around everyone regardless of

> anyone else - pretty disrespectful and ironic

> given how quickly most cyclists complain about the

> lack of respect their given with regard to their

> own safety.

>

> Feel that some cyclists need to learn to treat

> others how they'd like to be treated themselves.

buggie

buggie

Posted
Posted

Erm, how about not? If a cyclist doesn't have the sense to get off their bike & causes an accident by riding on the pavement then it's their fault, not the contractors (unsure where exactly you think s cycle lane could gone!) the road is closed to all traffic & if you don't want to use the diversion for all other wheeled traffic then go through on foot.


Am guessing you're not in PR as you're doing a pretty shocking job of sounding reasonable/endearing me to you.




nunhead_man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As I said buggie -

>

> "Now if the contractors had left a cycle lane as

> opposed to leaving us fighting it out with

> pedestrians I'd feel cyclists finally have a

> place

>

> So how about blaming the contractors not the

> cyclists?

>

> Southwark KNOWS how many cyclists use that route

> in weekday am and pm - if not a lane why not a

> diversion?

>

> buggie Wrote:

> >

> > Having been a pedestrian "fighting it out" with

> > cyclists through the Rye Lane roadworks the

> other

> > day, my over riding feeling was get off you

> bike

> > and push it for 100yrds.

> > I was not alone in having a small child with me

> > and couldn't believe the callous & unthoughtful

> > attitude of several cyclists who seemed to see

> it

> > as a sport to weave around everyone regardless

> of

> > anyone else - pretty disrespectful and ironic

> > given how quickly most cyclists complain about

> the

> > lack of respect their given with regard to

> their

> > own safety.

> >

> > Feel that some cyclists need to learn to treat

> > others how they'd like to be treated themselves.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave
      Gail's Development of the Brick House - planning permission?

      By CPR Dave · Posted

      I've actually met Luke Johnson and he's actually a very amicable, witty and extremely clever man. He's also created thousands of jobs and generated millions and millions of pounds of tax revenue for the government, offering goods and hospitality that countless millions of people have enjoyed over the decades. I'm not a fan of Gail's but I'm also not a fan of people who knock down good guys that have contributed a huge amount to this country.  Anyway, French Patisseries and southern hemisphere coffee don't belong on Farmer's markets. 
    • ianr
      Should facial recognition be mandatory for retail outlets?

      By ianr · Posted

      What mandatory action would then be required of them?
    • CPR Dave
      Should facial recognition be mandatory for retail outlets?

      By CPR Dave · Posted

      Probably will be mandatory once Digital ID comes in.    They can then use the cameras on the tills too to bring all sorts of other useful ancillary controls, such as limiting how much alcohol you buy each week, or monitoring and limiting the carbon footprint of the food you buy (some foods now are already showing the CO2 emissions consumed in producing them).
    • vladi
      Should facial recognition be mandatory for retail outlets?

      By vladi · Posted

      At present several large retailers such as Co-op, Tesco, Waitrose, John Lewis, and Next use a cloud-based facial recognition system that gives instant alerts to the entry on the premises of known shoplifters.  Around £19 million incidents of retail theft (some with attacks on staff) occur ever year in the UK amounting in value to £2.6 Billion in value, involving 41,000 known offenders. Shoplifting adds to the retailer's costs and this is passed on eventually to honest shoppers, isn't there a case for F.R. to become mandatory at all retailers?

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...