Jump to content

Local Lothario (Lounged)

FelicityNormal

By FelicityNormal
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Huguenot

Huguenot

Posted
Posted

If you argued that society considers promiscuity to be delinquent, and that being a Lothario shows a lack of consideration for the well being of others, then you could argue that it was defamation. If it suggested an element of sexual harassment then it would be damaging for his business.


It wouldn't be me arguing it mind, it would be lawyers who cost more money than the adminstrator posesses. It wouldn't matter if he won or lost, he'd be poor.

Mikecg

Mikecg

Posted
Posted

I've been visiting a muso forum for about 6 years now, and if the libus thing you are touting were a serious threat I would be in guantanamo bay now getting water boarded. However I resect your experience and judgment.


Thing is, their are other derogatory comments about another establishment within this thread, why hasn't that been edited out.? you cant be half baked about policing peoples comments. or can ya........

Mikecg

Mikecg

Posted
Posted
Its only a forum and people do get heated, and say some really inflamatory things to each other. I have first hand experiences from this place. On the otherhand it's all part of it I suppose. Some do take it to a really serious level though. I've always treated these places as a platform to take the piss sometimes. But I wouldnt want to really upset people into wanting to persu vengence through the legal system. Id rather meetup for a beer or fisticuffs over the park....
FelicityNormal

FelicityNormal

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I don't think it's libel if what you are saying is true, and in this case it is true. However, I will not publish the man's name on here. That said, he is something of a danger for several reasons. I am astonished more of you have not had horrible run-ins with him.
red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Hi Huguenot,


What's your thoughts on the libel situation re. BBW's comment, afterall an establishment is named in the post?..

For the record my original post was very firmly tongue in cheek (no pun intended) as anyone who frequents that establishment will understand...;-)


Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi red devil and Mickecg, unfortunately Asset's

> right, and the 'allegedly' isn't defence. Only

> 'fair comment' and legal proof are defences.

> Neither are applicable in this situation, and it's

> highly defamatory.

>

> I don't think you guys were regulars when the

> Forum had its last run in with libel, and it gets

> very messy very quickly.

>

> May I volunteer that you could go back and edit

> your posts to avoid any mention of anything that

> could identify the chap? Even cryptic

> identification is a no-no. If you can tell who he

> is by any means, then we all go down.

Cassius

Cassius

Posted
Posted

FelicityNormal Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It involves an individual purposely spreading a

> life-threatening STD, among other things.


Whoa - that's a pretty damning accusation! Do you have proof of this? If so then surely that is a criminal offence and should be reported. If not....................

RosieH

RosieH

Posted
Posted

FelicityNormal Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It involves an individual purposely spreading a

> life-threatening STD, among other things.



I think reckless or intentional transmission are criminal offences, so the police could be involved. If that's the case, better to involve them and do something to put a stop to it than scaremongering on a forum surely...

FelicityNormal

FelicityNormal

Posted
  • Author
Posted
This individual has not had the chance to give me anything as I turned him down but I've since discovered that he's been with two local women I know and one of them now has health problems as a result. Wondering if he is purposely trying to harm people or he is just randy as hell and being reckless.
Cassius

Cassius

Posted
Posted

FelicityNormal Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This individual has not had the chance to give me

> anything as I turned him down but I've since

> discovered that he's been with two local women I

> know and one of them now has health problems as a

> result. Wondering if he is purposely trying to

> harm people or he is just randy as hell and being

> reckless.


Randy as hell and being reckless is NOT the same as " an individual purposely spreading a

> life-threatening STD, among other things"


Such comments are inflammatory at the least!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Angelina
      The Johnson papers

      By Angelina · Posted

      he's not on the general radar - not with the Labour tax scandal and the new Tories wanting to buddy up with Starmer (on their terms). if anything, he's a irrelevant distraction from some real alarms
    • malumbu
      The Johnson papers

      By malumbu · Posted

      Let me rephrase this He does not seem to be personally bothered by the impact he has.  Rather than immune from somebody taking action against him.  Although the bar had to be raised and raised before anyone did anything, and there are still those in his party who think it was wrong to get rid of him. He delivered a poor Brexit so didn't get that right.  He didn't believe in it, in the first place, he was just getting one up on his chum Dave.
    • jazzer
      The Johnson papers

      By jazzer · Posted

      1. No he's not, he made a pigs ear of things, his leadership was poor and his behaviour was unbecoming of the highest office in the land.  2. No they don't,  he was a prime buffoon 3. Not a messiah, in no way. He caused great damage to both the Party and Country after three years of differing by May. The only thing he completed was B  r  e  x  i  t.  Are we paying the price. Don't ask me, I was in an induced coma at the time, fighting for my own life.    
    • jazzer
      Mahmood says she could......

      By jazzer · Posted

      My comment is trying to not take any political side but rather be objective on what I see, hear and read. If the Government made a positive difference to people's lives, people would be pro this Govt, but sadly the majority don't see an improvement since they have been in Office, but rather the opposite so people's opinions of the Government are poor.  I think if you did a straw poll of users on here, the result for those in favour of the Government is likely to be unfavourable, but I may be totally wrong, quite possible. No one I speak or am in contact with has a single good word to say about the current Administration. In fact the calls for a General Election just become stronger and stronger. 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...