Jump to content

Jaqui Smith in Daily Mail

SusyQ

By SusyQ
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

DaveR

DaveR

Posted
Posted

"In terms of actual percentages, the majority of those figures have a negligible difference. Certainly not significant to warrant the cacophony of snobbish tutting on here."


B&llocks.


Robbery - Nunhead 4 x ED


Drug offences - Nunhead 7 x ED


Burglary - Nunhead 40% higher than ED


The perception that ED is a lower crime area than Nunhead is correct. But as you say, within an area there are lots of other factors that make you more or less likely to be a victim. I've never thought of Nunhead as unsafe, and I don't now I've seen those figures (I was surprised that Nunhead rates higher than the Southwark average for robbery)

Tony.London Suburbs

Tony.London Suburbs

Posted
Posted

Asset Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> only badass mothers may apply


Fair Enough. I don't mind taking on The Peckham Posse or The Brixton Massif but I'm defintely NOT getting involved with no

badass mothers, I know my capabilities and many limitations...

NunheadGirl

NunheadGirl

Posted
Posted

The Daily Mail is really only fit to use to line the cat litter tray, so don't expect to read anything sensible in it.


I love Nunhead, alway have and always will. I love some of our local shops, but am also glad to have ED just across the park. I totally respect the views of those who prefer East Dulwich, but don't see why there has to be any snobbery about it. Surely we can all live alongside each other quite happily? I reckon there are good and bad things about both areas.


Nunhead Girl

honk

honk

Posted
Posted

NunheadGirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Daily Mail is really only fit to use to line

> the cat litter tray, so don't expect to read

> anything sensible in it.

>

> I love Nunhead, alway have and always will. I

> love some of our local shops, but am also glad to

> have ED just across the park. I totally respect

> the views of those who prefer East Dulwich, but

> don't see why there has to be any snobbery about

> it. Surely we can all live alongside each other

> quite happily? I reckon there are good and bad

> things about both areas.

>

> Nunhead Girl


Indeed. I love Nunhead, the fishmongers is one of the best in south london too.

snorky

snorky

Posted
Posted

daily mail= not fit for wiping my spotty middling class arse on


any posting that refers/ quotes the DM is 100% fail.


all fail, all the time


( why Am i sitting hre, several thousand miles from the blood spattered streets of SE London, posting on this fourm ? I must get a life )

honk

honk

Posted
Posted

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> honk Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Indeed. I love Nunhead.

>

> Me too.. especially the magic of the nunhead

> forum

>

> Lively as ever.


Looks like they could do with someone who knows what they're doing to actually build it...

TJ

TJ

Posted
Posted

Those drugs figures are way off. Its snowing indoors in ED too.


Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You knew I couldn't let it lie...

>

> Nunhead Figures

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/file.php?5

> ,file=3322

>

> ED Figures

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/file.php?5

> ,file=3323

nunheadbelle

nunheadbelle

Posted
Posted

I love Nunhead, it's a lovely area. Previously lived in East Dulwich.

Where I am:

Nunhead train station 5 minutes away (Blackfriars/Victoria)

P12 bus - 2 minutes away (Brockley or Surrey Quays)

343 bus - 5 minutes away (New Cross or London Bridge)

484 bus - 5 minutes away (Lewisham bus station or Camberwell)

Peckham Rye Park 10 minute walk away

Churches in either direction - 5 minute walk

Pubs nearby (one 1 minute away), Ivy House 5 minutes away

Jacqui Smith 5 minutes away ::o

Everything is within easy reach.


nunheadbelle

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • vladi
      Is Peter Mandelson toast

      By vladi · Posted

      I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • ArchieCarlos
      Planning application - new Underhill Rd residential development

      By ArchieCarlos · Posted

      Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • Spartacus
      Is Peter Mandelson toast

      By Spartacus · Posted

      I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • Insuflo
      Is Peter Mandelson toast

      By Insuflo · Posted

      And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...