Jump to content

Recommended Posts

moving2dulwich, ref your question "Can anyone recommend an establishment (bar) that has suitably discreet ideally unisex loos?"


... I think I have found the perfect solution for you(!)

Only thing is, I seem to remember spotting this somewhere in ED, but where oh where was it?????


http://th57.photobucket.com/albums/g207/doll_face1980/th_double-toilets.jpg


off out now for a bit of Valentine's double-trouble

No, no karter, me plus ONE other = two


that's quite enough 'trouble' for me



karter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> off out now for a bit of Valentine's

> double-trouble

>

>

> Charlies you really are very naughty. One man not

> enough for you?

>

> Edited due to scripting mistake :-S

jaybee82 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm sure Ive seen toilets like that when I was in

> the States. Yeah thats right, in McDonalds.

>

> One for each cheek.


If that's the case, no wonder McDonald's have the highest paid cleaners in the world.

Thin ice Dulwichmum, thin ice. You must remember that us citizens of the blue borough have ready access to automatic weapons so think before you post or I'll be forced to dump lead on you from my Tech nine machine. It would be a shame as your last blog nearly broke a rib 'No scowled the precious child. "This is the X-Factor and bunny is Leona Lewis". Ha ha!

Oh Mr Wolf darling, you are so kind. However, the London Borough of Lewisham is simply NOCD! I imagine that their tiny grey houses are choc full of lazy boy chairs, fake Ugg boots and copies of the Daily Mail...


http://wrjih.files.wordpress.com/2006/07/lazyboy2-large.jpg

You forgot the blue slim rizla, empty cans of white lightening cider and lottery tickets all provided by the annual ponce packet from the dept of work and pensions but apart from that it sounds as though you once lived in Catdord before being introduced to Dulwichdad from your accurate and considerate reply.

Mr Wolf,


Catford darling?


Who sweetie?


Me sweetie (makes vomiting gesture)?


NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO sweetie.


I watched the early episodes of The Royle Family, and engage in occasional charity work, so I know what goes on (smirk).


Here in Dulwich (West, Village and SE21), our progeny play stringed instruments from an early age. Housekeepers do needle point, fathers follow supper with cheese and biscuits and mothers bitch about school league tables and spend fortunes on shoes (NOT MBTs).


I am from Beckenham and am of aristocratic Argentinian parentage...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
    • The sites in question though are not comparable to the builders yard by the station and less likely to be granted planning permission for 9 storey buildings. The builders yard fronts on to the railway line on one side and virtually no residential property surrounding on the other sides. The Gibbs & Dandy /Kwikfit and ED trading trading estate are surrounded at close proximity by residential, and in the case of the latter a Grade II building, so there would more stringent height restrictions. Both these sites are tired and sad looking, and in need of development to provide much needed housing.
    • Not sure if this is any help but was initally told to use google chrome as the browser and the code was the reference. However the person at Southwark parking took pity on me and did it for me 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...