Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know. It's an odd subject line. But seriously... I was wondering if this has happened to anyone else.


I came back home this afternoon, after being out for about an hour, to find Vaseline smeared around the Yale lock on my front door. Presumably, this is a sign of an unsuccessful break-in. The property has an alarm, which the perp would have experienced had they got in, and I've reported the incident to the police on 101. So I've probably done all I can for the moment apart from being a little more alert to goings-on when out and about in the area (probably a good thing) and being just a little more suspicious of folk (sadly, not so good).


Just wondered if anyone's noticed anything similar, or has any thoughts. PM me if you'd prefer.


Des

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/54471-suspicious-vaseline/
Share on other sites

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I appreciate this is a serious thread, but I

> really think Suspicious Vaseline would be a great

> name for a band.


I just logged on to write that the threasd title would make a great old school punk band name.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
    • Isabelle Capitain on 7 Upland Road will be able to do that for you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...