Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"

re: drop offs being permitted - would that really be a good idea


Wouldnb't a lot more people make use of such a facility and wouldn't that generate traffic congestion on Rye Lane itself? I always get the impression that road is only 3 or 4 more cars away from gridlock"


strafer -drop off could be to side of station in Blenheim/ Holly or Elm Grove ,not in Rye Lane itself .

Appeals against PCNs issued by local authorities are much harder than if it was on private land as different rules tend to apply. As mentioned by other posters there normally needs to be clear evidence that you were not at fault, such as lack of signage etc. The only successful appeal I had against a London borough was against a failure to display ticket in wondow. The ticket was there but reverse side showing. Fortunately a unique serial number gets printed on both sides and I could prove that the warden had the ability to check against the serial code to check details. I was also able to argue that the ticket was clearly displayed - as it did not specify which side had to be face up.

Congestion on Rye Lane itself is not an issue as far as I can see. But yeah, Blenheim/Holly/Elm Grove might work better.


Always worth contesting parking tickets if you have a good case. I contested two really ridiculous ones. I submitted my paperwork ahead of the hearing, the council did not. I won by default.

"strafer -drop off could be to side of station in Blenheim/ Holly or Elm Grove ,not in Rye Lane itself ."

"It is a dead end street at the bottom of Holly Grove. Goes nowhere and cannot cause any obstruction. "


yeah but if it's a dead end you have to navigate Rye Lane

Lowlander Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you need to drop off / pick up then Denmark

> Hill is easier (or East/North Dulwich)

>

> Peckham Rye and Rye Lane are terrible for

> traffic..


It would help if people looked at Google maps and see what they are actually commenting on.


you would then see that dropping people off is not a problem more a problem at the above stations.


Holly Grove. Car stops, cases/people out, goodbyes then gone.For Southwak.. Kerching


Cannot enter except from Bellenden Road

I get that you can?t turn from Rye Lane onto Holly Grove but the point stands ? traffic is very tight in that part of town. If you allow a designated zone for pick ups at the station it will generate traffic, through those back streets and on Rye Lane itself


How many cars could feasibly use the space by the station at the same time do people think?

Maybe it's me ,although I am exceptionally familar with Peckham Rye station and the surrounding roads but honestly Rye Lane is not involved in the dropping off /picking up scenario .As said you access and exit from Bellenden ,you don't touch Rye Lane .

"but honestly Rye Lane is not involved in the dropping off /picking up scenario ."


Thought I had agreed with that?


What I went on to say as that the smaller roads which will take the extra traffic will be affected. Also, the dropoff/pickup point will generate enough traffic to indirectly affect Rye Lane . But I agree - RL isn't the primary focal point

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "but honestly Rye Lane is not involved in the

> dropping off /picking up scenario ."

>

> Thought I had agreed with that?

>

> What I went on to say as that the smaller roads

> which will take the extra traffic will be

> affected. Also, the dropoff/pickup point will

> generate enough traffic to indirectly affect Rye

> Lane . But I agree - RL isn't the primary focal

> point



What extra traffic? The Holly grove next to Rye Lane is always packed with white vans and stalls and also goes nowhere but so you would be mad to try this. But the Bellenden Road/holly Grove presents no problem and is also targeted zealously.

Rowanofski I sympathise with you.


Seems like Southwark are setting up cameras in hotspots all over the borough just to make more money.


Going back to 2013. I had to pick up a parcel at the Camberwell Post Office collecting office on Station Road as wasn't in on the day postman tried to deliver (sure applies to lots of people).


Camberwell Station Road is very very wide but as there were no designated parking spaces, husband parked for exactly 2 minutes while I ran in to collect.


Received a PCN with terrible photos with a tree obscuring the fact that husband was at wheel of car with engine running so not exactly parked. Also went on and on about the 50cm specified distance from the kerb.


I appealed the original ?130 but Southwark said the term 'stopped', 'parked', and 'waiting' are synonymous blah blah and as they couldn't see my husband in the driving seat (obscured by tree branches) I still had to pay.


A neighbour got the same fine so beware the Camberwell Station Road collection point!

Yeah I've been stung at Camberwell Station Rd, waiting for my wife to pick up a parcel. That camera must be a great cash cow! I'm kind of torn. Although it was only a short amount of time and inconvenienced nobody so you'd hope a "common sense" approach could be taken, I'm not sure how such a distinction could be made in practise.

minder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rowanofski I sympathise with you.

>

> Seems like Southwark are setting up cameras in

> hotspots all over the borough just to make more

> money.


Well, if particular restrictions were in place before the cameras went up, it's not just to make money - it's to enforce existing parking restrictions. But if they start putting extra restrictions with cameras around the borough in an arbitrary way, then yes, it would be just to make money.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah I've been stung at Camberwell Station Rd,

> waiting for my wife to pick up a parcel. That

> camera must be a great cash cow! I'm kind of torn.

> Although it was only a short amount of time and

> inconvenienced nobody so you'd hope a "common

> sense" approach could be taken, I'm not sure how

> such a distinction could be made in practise.



Looking at when the car arrived and when it left. Taking the p.ss, issue ticket.

Unfortunately local authority workers no matter where in the country do seem to be lacking something where common sense and consideration is required.

Last weeks dispatches was on private parking companies and the culture there definitely is to issue as many tickets as possible. A common sense aproach would be to have a designated drop of/ collect point outside things like stations, with a 5 min waiting time limit. The same dispatches program made the point the the law was changed by this government so that it is no longer necessary to prove who was driving the vehicle. We have the most cctv cameras in the world and most of them are trained on drivers. So obviously a cash cow.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This is horrible to hear about. We used to get daily Police patrols on foot & even regular patrols on horseback in the area. I know our local station had some bad eggs, but the officers I came across in the area back then were all a fantastic bunch. Sadly nowadays the Met's presence is non-existent, bar the weekly walk from the SNT. I hope something gets done, arrests made and the victim some genuine support and counselling.   
    • Two wrongs don't make a right. Labour ran on a manifesto of "we aren't like them" and "we are different" and"you can trust us/we will restore faith in politics". They are doing nothing to convince anyone that any of those promises are being met - they are letting everyone down. u-turning on everything and are fast-tracking the doomsday scenario of a Reform government. Even the runway on the "it's all the Tories fault" is running out. I dislike politicians because they cannot be trusted and Rayner just highlighted that with ribbons on. She should have been so careful after the focus on the electoral roll issues she had with the house in Ashton-under-Lyne and then under a year later this comes up. Clearly the advice she took included a recommendation to take proper advice that she failed to do - that's just daft and the most galling thing is that she didn't just resign when this came up - she tried to spin out of it but must have known she was toast. Trust is fast being eroded. I desperately want Labour and Starmer to fix this because the alternative it too scary to think about but the way things are going they are fast-tracking Farage into No.10. Labour are letting us all down.  
    • Same can be said for the current and prior governments 
    • Good afternoon, We are looking for a gardener to tidy up our climbing rose. It is very high, so the work will require someone with a tall ladder. can you please recommend anyone?  thanks s
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...