Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"

re: drop offs being permitted - would that really be a good idea


Wouldnb't a lot more people make use of such a facility and wouldn't that generate traffic congestion on Rye Lane itself? I always get the impression that road is only 3 or 4 more cars away from gridlock"


strafer -drop off could be to side of station in Blenheim/ Holly or Elm Grove ,not in Rye Lane itself .

Appeals against PCNs issued by local authorities are much harder than if it was on private land as different rules tend to apply. As mentioned by other posters there normally needs to be clear evidence that you were not at fault, such as lack of signage etc. The only successful appeal I had against a London borough was against a failure to display ticket in wondow. The ticket was there but reverse side showing. Fortunately a unique serial number gets printed on both sides and I could prove that the warden had the ability to check against the serial code to check details. I was also able to argue that the ticket was clearly displayed - as it did not specify which side had to be face up.

Congestion on Rye Lane itself is not an issue as far as I can see. But yeah, Blenheim/Holly/Elm Grove might work better.


Always worth contesting parking tickets if you have a good case. I contested two really ridiculous ones. I submitted my paperwork ahead of the hearing, the council did not. I won by default.

"strafer -drop off could be to side of station in Blenheim/ Holly or Elm Grove ,not in Rye Lane itself ."

"It is a dead end street at the bottom of Holly Grove. Goes nowhere and cannot cause any obstruction. "


yeah but if it's a dead end you have to navigate Rye Lane

Lowlander Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you need to drop off / pick up then Denmark

> Hill is easier (or East/North Dulwich)

>

> Peckham Rye and Rye Lane are terrible for

> traffic..


It would help if people looked at Google maps and see what they are actually commenting on.


you would then see that dropping people off is not a problem more a problem at the above stations.


Holly Grove. Car stops, cases/people out, goodbyes then gone.For Southwak.. Kerching


Cannot enter except from Bellenden Road

I get that you can?t turn from Rye Lane onto Holly Grove but the point stands ? traffic is very tight in that part of town. If you allow a designated zone for pick ups at the station it will generate traffic, through those back streets and on Rye Lane itself


How many cars could feasibly use the space by the station at the same time do people think?

Maybe it's me ,although I am exceptionally familar with Peckham Rye station and the surrounding roads but honestly Rye Lane is not involved in the dropping off /picking up scenario .As said you access and exit from Bellenden ,you don't touch Rye Lane .

"but honestly Rye Lane is not involved in the dropping off /picking up scenario ."


Thought I had agreed with that?


What I went on to say as that the smaller roads which will take the extra traffic will be affected. Also, the dropoff/pickup point will generate enough traffic to indirectly affect Rye Lane . But I agree - RL isn't the primary focal point

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "but honestly Rye Lane is not involved in the

> dropping off /picking up scenario ."

>

> Thought I had agreed with that?

>

> What I went on to say as that the smaller roads

> which will take the extra traffic will be

> affected. Also, the dropoff/pickup point will

> generate enough traffic to indirectly affect Rye

> Lane . But I agree - RL isn't the primary focal

> point



What extra traffic? The Holly grove next to Rye Lane is always packed with white vans and stalls and also goes nowhere but so you would be mad to try this. But the Bellenden Road/holly Grove presents no problem and is also targeted zealously.

Rowanofski I sympathise with you.


Seems like Southwark are setting up cameras in hotspots all over the borough just to make more money.


Going back to 2013. I had to pick up a parcel at the Camberwell Post Office collecting office on Station Road as wasn't in on the day postman tried to deliver (sure applies to lots of people).


Camberwell Station Road is very very wide but as there were no designated parking spaces, husband parked for exactly 2 minutes while I ran in to collect.


Received a PCN with terrible photos with a tree obscuring the fact that husband was at wheel of car with engine running so not exactly parked. Also went on and on about the 50cm specified distance from the kerb.


I appealed the original ?130 but Southwark said the term 'stopped', 'parked', and 'waiting' are synonymous blah blah and as they couldn't see my husband in the driving seat (obscured by tree branches) I still had to pay.


A neighbour got the same fine so beware the Camberwell Station Road collection point!

Yeah I've been stung at Camberwell Station Rd, waiting for my wife to pick up a parcel. That camera must be a great cash cow! I'm kind of torn. Although it was only a short amount of time and inconvenienced nobody so you'd hope a "common sense" approach could be taken, I'm not sure how such a distinction could be made in practise.

minder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rowanofski I sympathise with you.

>

> Seems like Southwark are setting up cameras in

> hotspots all over the borough just to make more

> money.


Well, if particular restrictions were in place before the cameras went up, it's not just to make money - it's to enforce existing parking restrictions. But if they start putting extra restrictions with cameras around the borough in an arbitrary way, then yes, it would be just to make money.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah I've been stung at Camberwell Station Rd,

> waiting for my wife to pick up a parcel. That

> camera must be a great cash cow! I'm kind of torn.

> Although it was only a short amount of time and

> inconvenienced nobody so you'd hope a "common

> sense" approach could be taken, I'm not sure how

> such a distinction could be made in practise.



Looking at when the car arrived and when it left. Taking the p.ss, issue ticket.

Unfortunately local authority workers no matter where in the country do seem to be lacking something where common sense and consideration is required.

Last weeks dispatches was on private parking companies and the culture there definitely is to issue as many tickets as possible. A common sense aproach would be to have a designated drop of/ collect point outside things like stations, with a 5 min waiting time limit. The same dispatches program made the point the the law was changed by this government so that it is no longer necessary to prove who was driving the vehicle. We have the most cctv cameras in the world and most of them are trained on drivers. So obviously a cash cow.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think the Brixton Pound lives on, so there must be some kind of appetite for it, but I'm afraid I doubt it would be very useful for me.
    • My primary issue is the noise level and the fact that it begins at dusk and continues well into the early hours, the odd random bang being possibly the worst aspect as you never know when the next volley will occur. This is no longer about celebrating a turning point as the clock strikes 12am, but more a lengthy indulgence in ear shattering bangs, where there also seems to be competition as to who can create the loudest most startling barrage of sustained noise. A new thing is daytime fireworks, where buyers are urged to forget the visual aspect and focus on getting the biggest bang for their buck. I am lucky as I am not super sensitive to noise but I really feel for those who are. As for pets, I am afraid there are now many that require serious medication to get them through- and those meds are not cheap. The fault here is not with the animals or people sensitive to extreme bangs, but with those who insist on their right to impose it on all around them, not just for half an hour a few times a year, but for hours on customary dates and now  spreading to random events throughout the year.I  New Year fireworks is a very recent construct, and now Halloween Fireworks are becoming a thing. Why should we encourage and condone a proliferating societal noise addiction? It really is isn't healthy. Let those who wish to damage their eardrums enjoy their pastime through headphones; they can turn the volume up as high as they like.  If last night was the end of it then that is great but I think there'll be more through the weekend and more discarded jumbo firework boxes dumped in the park. I hope we follow other countries in adopting low noise fireworks and drone shows instead.    
    • NYE is always like this. If you’re concerned about your pets, please consider seeing a vet as they can help. We give our dog valerian and play calming music, which helps especially after long walks and a big dinner. If it’s for yourself, it’s one night, so also suggest seeing your doctor for advice.  It is loud, although more predictable ( kept to evening:to midnight) than Guy Fawkes celebrations which go on for days and are arguably selfish and inconsiderate. Either way, it’s a very difficult time for many.     
    • Thanks Rowan! Well done you have done amazing on your fitness journey. Happy New Year EDF and all my wonderful clients whom I've had the pleasure to train this year. I'm looking forward to 2026 🙌🎊
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...