Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Eliza.D Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I suspect that getting towards the end of the

> financial year we will see a lot more roadworks,

> coned off lanes and temp traffic lights with not

> alot of work going on.


xxxxx


well surely the work will be going on, because they've got to get it done before the end of the financial year, no??

Sue, I think to get the money committed they need to start it before the end of the financial year, but not necessarily complete it.


As a result London always gets this huge rash of holes dug in roads from late February to March - where no-one's fixing them because they're too busy starting more holes elsewhere.

And every private corp i have worked for too. In the interest of fairness


There is an essential difference in my experience.


Public Sector - budget = target. Must be spent or next year's budget will be reduced by at least the amount of unspent money. The aim of public sector accounting is not to overspend or underspend the budget to any noticeable degree.


Private Sector - budget = estimate of costs & revenues. If by spending more revenues profits rise - then spend more. If revenues & profits are falling, cut costs or redirect costs into revenue generating activity. I'd acknowledge that private sector departments such as marketing or HR may tend to spend to budget but a good Finance Director will encourage them otherwise very quickly.

Lizziedjango Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have just complained to the council. The

> temporary traffic lights aren't working properly

> and the traffic was hellish this morning,

> especially going UP Forest Hill Rd. There were no

> work men at all there either. Does anyone know

> what is going on here??



"There were no work men at all there either."


whats unusual about that. i think the surprise would have been if there were workmen there, even more surprising if they were doing any actual work.

AllforNun Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> point missed i think !

>

> anyway keep your scores to yourself or i'll put me

> jackboots on and drag you to Glastonbury !


OK - I thought the implication of "if it was a wing of Dulwich College i am sure the road works would be less and the moaning almost non existent." is that a) the roadworks might be done more efficiently - clearly nonsense so I ignored that bit and b) that people wouldn't complain if there were roadworks for a public school. So if all the parents of DC students were local residents then I can see what you might be saying, but surely that's not the case?


Please explain your point, or I shall put my designer sunglasses on and drag you off to Wimbledon!

Point being, if it were to be a public school of some kind or even a very selective school for ED boys then people would be out there digging the roads and sweeping up after the builders. They certainly would not give a hoot about the light and size of teh school! Because it is part of Lord Carpets of Peckham scheme, and there is another school of this type near called the Academy in Peckham it strikes fear into the hearts nimbies of nibbleton common ! Visions of an inner city version of Rydell High are keeping the curtains flapping and the tongues wagging. Summer days drifting away....oooh oooooooooohh for those Pecknarm nigh ights !

AFN, you've missed your target, snorky is more on the mark. There may be concern about the validity of the new Harris school and the sandwiching of 900 boys into 4 square inches, but very few ED folk will be sending their kids to Dulwich College. Don't over egg the class war pudding, or you'll find yourself with some unexpected middle-class allies.


Now, Centre Court or No.1?

Having driven past the works today I see that, apart from modifying the annoying "hump" at the entrance to Friern Road they have simply upgraded the previous very short and useless cycle paths that allowed cyclists to use the pavement to go around the pedestrian crossing lights. The cycle paths remain useless but now the ramps on / off the road are smooth and legant.


What a waste of money (and I'm a cyclist).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I thought that re ULEZ, but actually other places do have similar schemes, eg Bristol. I got caught by this a couple of years ago when Google maps sent me through Bristol en route to somewhere else. Though I did manage to get the fine waived. And other places are apparently going to have them, eg Oxford. As I found when I was considering selling the car in Oxford. Which I think is a very good thing, but not helpful if your car isn't compliant  Also in order to sell it I would presumably have to get it into working order, so I'd have to buy a new battery anyway. I use mostly buses and trains already, for travelling both within and outside London.  That's why I rarely use the car except for transporting bulky/heavy items, or going to places which aren't easy to reach via public transport, or giving people a lift who are not very mobile. The problem with hiring a car to go to a festival, for example,  is that I'd be paying for it to sit in a field for several days. And it would be impossible, or at least very difficult,  to transport a tent and camping equipment there by public transport. Not that I've been to any festivals lately. I think I'm talking myself into keeping the car. I did do sums when ULEZ came in. I've had a Freedom Pass for over fifteen years, gulp 😂
    • We used to have local councillors posting on this forum - are there any who are still members?
    • I've never owned a car in the 25 years I've lived in London.  I would regard it as  a hopeless waste of money  I walk, get public transport and taxis for the rare occasions when public transport won't cut it. Anything large that needs to be transporting to or away from my property - well pretty much all shops deliver and for anything  else  there is always someone who willing do it for a small fee. If I need a car to go somewhere outside of London (you would be surprised at how little this issue occurs) then hire cars exist.
    • Hi, we're in a similar position with our old people carrier and did a look back at our usage and then looked at the costs for car clubs, taxis and car hire costs if we got rid of it. In our case the away trips to family, especially during school holidays, makes it cheaper to keep ours and pay ULEZ (the away trips is the big cost for hiring). We rarely use it for local trips and plan usage to aim for multiple purpose trips. We also share with our neighbours such as moving large items with our people carrier and share the ulez cost. Generally for low use alone it will not make financial sense to buy a newer car. Also, if you have a petrol car check its NOx output amount for ULEZ compliance as TFL wrongly categorised many older cars. Did this for neighbours 2001 car and it's ULEZ compliant when TFL originally said it was not (now fixed) and having the same issue with a 1997 petrol car.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...