Jump to content

Recommended Posts

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> lady (or was it laddie?) muck if I recall pointed

> that one out aaaaaaaages and aaaaaaaaaages ago.


Don't think that was me...maybe it was her Ladyship...


> met the good Dr Medic IRL and he is indeed a

> lovely person...


Agreed, the Old Fart is a good egg. :))

Am I the only one to notice that this morning Laddy Muck aided by numbers had filled the whole page with Alan Medic threads. Hence the flies.


'A' for effort


If you look in the nether regions there is still a heavy Narnia presence

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Am I the only one to notice that this morning

> Laddy Muck aided by numbers had filled the whole

> page with Alan Medic threads. Hence the flies.

>

> 'A' for effort

>

> If you look in the nether regions there is still a

> heavy Narnia presence


'aided' by numbers?


bloomin' cheek...I was an essential part of the whole operation, godammit.


(thanks AQ, love you too) :)

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Am I the only one to notice that this morning

> Laddy Muck aided by numbers had filled the whole

> page with Alan Medic threads. Hence the flies.

>

> 'A' for effort


"numbers" was an equal member of a very efficient team...


Cheers steveo and AQ :)-D

as a new visitor to the EDF, I can be objective here. I come here to take the piss and mostly, but this may be only serious post . evah


there really is an undercurrent of if not ouright nastiness, but something not sorta comfortable going on, not going to say clique, but an aggressive tone that feels a bit uneasey, that seems to be popping up more and more in discussions. have a look at recent longiush threads- sperm flecked dismissives all over the place. this cant be comfortable reading for new visitors outside general section


Not that it really bothers me, my lifespan here is measured in hours rather than years, so i will be off soon im sure.

im pretty thick skinned on the EDF , as i have no investment in the ebb and flow of the fourm and rarely get into an argument or abuse because


a) they are usually wrong

b) they are always wrong


I often comment, then remove it (.) as its not worth the bother


Graham Greene described our man in Havana as an entertainment- and for me, thats as far as it can go

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> keekybreeks Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > im pretty thick skinned on the EDF

>

> But, but... you've only been here two days?

>

> Ha ha. I make myself laugh sometimes.



It was the cat/sink post that gave it away...

No RD, haven't a clue how to make one. My mum used to make it too. She's in her eighties now.

Surprisingly I'm nowhere near that but am probably turning into her as the years go by.


Please just try to be NICE.



edited to remove smiley face because smiley faces don't really belong on this thread.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...