Jump to content

Recommended Posts

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> lady (or was it laddie?) muck if I recall pointed

> that one out aaaaaaaages and aaaaaaaaaages ago.


Don't think that was me...maybe it was her Ladyship...


> met the good Dr Medic IRL and he is indeed a

> lovely person...


Agreed, the Old Fart is a good egg. :))

Am I the only one to notice that this morning Laddy Muck aided by numbers had filled the whole page with Alan Medic threads. Hence the flies.


'A' for effort


If you look in the nether regions there is still a heavy Narnia presence

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Am I the only one to notice that this morning

> Laddy Muck aided by numbers had filled the whole

> page with Alan Medic threads. Hence the flies.

>

> 'A' for effort

>

> If you look in the nether regions there is still a

> heavy Narnia presence


'aided' by numbers?


bloomin' cheek...I was an essential part of the whole operation, godammit.


(thanks AQ, love you too) :)

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Am I the only one to notice that this morning

> Laddy Muck aided by numbers had filled the whole

> page with Alan Medic threads. Hence the flies.

>

> 'A' for effort


"numbers" was an equal member of a very efficient team...


Cheers steveo and AQ :)-D

as a new visitor to the EDF, I can be objective here. I come here to take the piss and mostly, but this may be only serious post . evah


there really is an undercurrent of if not ouright nastiness, but something not sorta comfortable going on, not going to say clique, but an aggressive tone that feels a bit uneasey, that seems to be popping up more and more in discussions. have a look at recent longiush threads- sperm flecked dismissives all over the place. this cant be comfortable reading for new visitors outside general section


Not that it really bothers me, my lifespan here is measured in hours rather than years, so i will be off soon im sure.

im pretty thick skinned on the EDF , as i have no investment in the ebb and flow of the fourm and rarely get into an argument or abuse because


a) they are usually wrong

b) they are always wrong


I often comment, then remove it (.) as its not worth the bother


Graham Greene described our man in Havana as an entertainment- and for me, thats as far as it can go

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> keekybreeks Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > im pretty thick skinned on the EDF

>

> But, but... you've only been here two days?

>

> Ha ha. I make myself laugh sometimes.



It was the cat/sink post that gave it away...

No RD, haven't a clue how to make one. My mum used to make it too. She's in her eighties now.

Surprisingly I'm nowhere near that but am probably turning into her as the years go by.


Please just try to be NICE.



edited to remove smiley face because smiley faces don't really belong on this thread.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...