Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HonaloochieB, I heard from some hirsute

> big-toothed bloke in the queue for William Rose

> that you were running for Mayor! Is it true?


Moos we live in a world where hirsute big-toothed blokes say all sorts of things. One can't go from A to B these days without being accosted by an hirsute big-toothed bloke asking if one is going to run for the mayoral office.

I can categorically deny that it is my intention to seek any form, shape or shadow of public office in the near, far, distant or indeed even past future.

However and I don't use the word however lightly, if the people of London and by people I mean carbon-based life forms, were to rise up en masse and carry me to wherever the mayor's office is and throw me bodily through the door while chanting 'HONALOOCHIEB FOR MAYOR' and 'HONALOOCHIE HONALOOCHIE HE'S OUR MAN HE CAN DO IT IF ANYONE CAN' and similar, then who am I to say them nay?

The people have spoken, I run on a 'broad' manifesto of free public transport, clean air and Mott The Hoople in every home.

Details to follow.

Mikecg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't mean to question your musical taste HB,

> but the bloke in that band cant sing, I'm only

> going by the David Bowie song he murdered.

>

> I would be a conscientious objector if you got

> into power.


It's OK Mike when I seize power the tone deaf and musically enfeebled won't be allowed voting rights.

It'll all be in the manifesto.

Or personifesto as I call it on account of not wanting to alienate the chick vote.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
    • He is toast  he should never have been appointed  and starmer flannelling about all of this shows exceptionally poor judgement  a disgrace all around 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...