Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I appreciate that there is a thread in the main section about this but many mums may not be aware of this.


Children going to the Charter School on the 37 bus are going to be badly affected by the proposed changes to the East Dulwich Grove/ Townley Road junction.


These changes involve narrowing the roadway and reducing the dual lanes at the traffic lights. The Southwark officials attending the drop-in session yesterday admitted that the scheme will increase the tail-backs of traffic on EDG.


In the morning rush hour, the tail back at this junction often goes back as far as the hospital. If this goes ahead then it will certainly go back to around Melbourne Grove which frankly is unacceptable by any measure. It's bad enough already but this will make it worse.


The only official way to oppose this scheme is to use the on-line feedback form on this link:-


https://forms.southwark.gov.uk/ShowForm.asp


There is another option called "10b" which will allow the traffic to flow better than it is now. To support this option it is necessary to mention 10b in the "Comments" section, as your preference.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/54953-getting-to-charter-by-37-bus/
Share on other sites

vesti Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Surely, given the limited catchment area, the

> pupils can just walk.


The Charter School does not have a defined catchment area - as confirmed on their web site.


Quite a few of the pupils use it regularly and even more when the weather's bad. Lots also come by train to North Dulwich.


DG

  • 1 month later...
I lived on East Dulwich Grove for years and was always stunned to see teenagers waiting for 15 mins for the 37 from outside Pizza Gogo or even, incredibly, from the stop by Alleyn's to go to Charter? a few hundred metres away?from the Townley Rd junction it must be 4 minutes on foot max.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If the cyclist wasn't wearing lights and hi viz, did it really happen..........?
    • I don't think anyone here is claiming the Torygraph is the paragon of good reporting, or impartiality. I was referring to media organisations across the spectrum, and I opened it wide up, way beyond the BBC.  But, to your point, if you're making a programme about abortion, say, you're not going to interview the man/woman on the street with a moderate view, you're always going to go to the people at the extreme ends, that's the point of the exercise, right? And most people watching innately know what's objectively right and wrong, because mainly they're decent people who've had the privilege of growing up in a liberal, free-thinking, tolerant democracy.  There have always been despicable people, and there always will be. Things feel worse at the moment because of the immediacy of media, but maybe they aren't. One day, Trump will be a blip in history and everyone will be consumed with the next big problem. Probably a genocidal robot.   
    • If a pedestrian gets hit by a bike, it can be very serious. All it takes is someone not spotting a cyclist coming up at speed.    Clearly, no one wants a collision. so let’s just make it easier to be seen and for everyone to be safe. Bike lights (front and back), helmet lights, reflective strips on your backpack, high visibility clips on the ankles, wrists, lights on your spikes… it’s not hard and it shouldn’t be expensive. I’m just wondering if cyclists haven’t yet adjusted to the darker evenings and don’t actually realise. Perhaps cyclists don’t drive but would benefit from doing so and seeing what it’s like from a drivers point of view.  All cars had lights on.  One of the Boris bikes didn’t, it must have been broken as I thought they were automatic.
    • The other thing is that the money the council makes from the festival is not spent in the local area, whereas money made from events in other parks are. Renata Hamvas would have to approve any change to the premises licence before the events team can consider a license for the proposal in the current form. There needs to be an organised local pushback this time, to at least stop that second weekend being granted. I am thinking along the lines of a door to door petition. There are local elections next May. Lot's of opportunity to make this an election issue for impacted wards around the park. Just need to be orgaised. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...