Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Given concerns discussed on this forum about behaviour on buses I thought EDF members might like to be made aware of this new reporting trial that is being carried out over the next three months and includes bus services in Southwark.


From TfL:


I am writing to let you know about a new text/phone/email service that TfL and the Metropolitan Police Transport Operational Command Unit (MPS TOCU) are launching.


From 1 March 2009, we shall begin a three month trial of a service that will allow members of the public to text, phone or email information about inconsiderate, intimidating or otherwise anti-social bad behaviour on buses. The trial will last for three months and will apply to bus routes operating in Lewisham, Lambeth and Southwark. Clearly anti-social behaviour can be very intimidating. We hope that by providing these new direct channels, passengers can assist us in deploying police resources effectively. We shall assess the trial to determine to what extent Police intelligence is improved as a result of this form of direct passenger feedback. If the trial is judged a success, consideration will be given to a wider roll-out.


We shall distribute information cards with key contact details at transport hubs and shopping centres in the three boroughs. I have set this out below also. Secondary school children will receive the same information, but on Oyster card wallets, which will be distributed to the 50 secondary schools in Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham. The MPS TOCU will monitor all calls, texts, and emails received on a daily basis. Any information received that is relevant to other policing teams will be fed through to them.


Passengers will be able to feed information to their local policing team by:


CALLING Lambeth/Southwark 0800 028 7820

Lewisham 0800 028 7760


TEXTING The word BUS followed by the message to 80010. (A text will be charged at the standard text message rate).


EMAILING [email protected]


GOING ONLINE At www.met.police.uk


Tessa Jowell MP

Is this reserved for reporting annoying little gobshites or can it also be used every time you stand aside for a lady or older person and some self-consumed, titcocking city boy thinks that?s it is his right to push in?


Not that I have a personal bugbear about this or anything.

That's never happened to me, but I would be prepared to let the city boy verbally have it myself. Sadly the little gob shites are probably armed so I would slope off and moan about it on here rather than risk a kicking or worse from an 11 year old. (it has happened before anyone chips in on this - I was chased up ED Train Station by a gang of teenagers and fully shat me pants!)


Any initiative on highlighting anti social public transport behaviour is good, but, the figures must be openly acted upon.

Oh I say..Is there an email address for uk.reassurance? You know, re anti-social behaviour everywhere.


I guess not, because "uk.reassurance", that would be the job for the UK government, "TJMP" included.


And we have got this lot. The same government that has just refused the Information Tribunal's order to release the cabinet minutes covering their decision to take us into war on the basis of a great big whopping lie.


The same government that wouldn't award the police their full pay award, while exploiting every loophole to fill their own pockets with immoral expense claims. And don't mention Italy, whatever you do. It's just not nice to remind anyone about all the dead and dying people.


How does anyone expect the young to behave, given the example of this woman and her chums?

Blimey - once again, I can see why no politician would want to help anyone, given the cyncism displayed there snoozequeen


Given the specific nature of the problem can we deal with it rather than all of societies ill. Most of the little maggots acting up on buses are blissfully unaware of what does or doesn't happen chez Tessa Jowell or anyone else


TJMP - what sort of steps are in place to stop the scheme being abused - eg if some gang decided to text lots of messages about a specific problem on bus A purely to divert police/TFL resources, this enabling them to get up to whatever on bus B?

Sean, politicians and especially our MP aren't meant "to want to help people" they're paid to do just that (in theory)....some of us are a little bit cynical about TJMPs communications on the EDF getting nearer to an election when we never see her on our streets

I'm not saying suspenc cynicism and I'm not saying your rationale isn't justified - but on this specific thread, as a scheme that might actually hellp and do something on the buses, let's run with that.


If we want to talk down politicians endlessly let's start a specific thread in the lounge but for the love of all that's good and holy allow SOME room for dialogue. Otherwise "they" on that side of the fence are completely justified in saying the public deserve what they get as we are a bunch of unhelpful, mean spirited ungrateful little bollixes

This scheme does sound like a good idea although I agree with James that I only found out about it on this forum which doesn't bode well really. I get regular email updates from TFL about which tube stations will be shut at the weekend - I would have thought they could tack information about this scheme onto one of their emails? I imagine most people who own an Oyster card get these emails.
I'm with Sean on this one, say what you will about the goverment, this is a good idea, and not the thread to start a general heard it all before critique of the rights and wrongs of the war! For the record, I marched against the war, and have never voted labour, but still want my bus rides to be nicer.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm with Sean on this one, say what you will about

> the goverment, this is a good idea,


Up to a point. It's a whole four-and-a-bit months since the Met launched a campaign with the strapline "You now only need to know two numbers to contact the Metropolitan Police". The success of that has obviously opened minds.


Does anyone remember what 101 was for?

Burbage Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Keef Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'm with Sean on this one, say what you will

> about

> > the goverment, this is a good idea,

>

> Up to a point. It's a whole four-and-a-bit months

> since the Met launched a campaign with the

> strapline "You now only need to know two numbers

> to contact the Metropolitan Police". The success

> of that has obviously opened minds.

>

> Does anyone remember what 101 was for?


xxxxxxx


Are we talking 1984? I'm confused :-$

101 is, and very possibly was, the Home Office plan for a national SNEN (single non-emergency number) devoted to anti-social behaviour and community safety issues. Following a vigorous campaign, the scheme was officially adopted around five years ago, with the help of Ofcom, the telecommunications industry and a bunch of local authorities, police forces, fire brigades etc. Since then, plenty of time and money has been spent putting the infrastructure in place and running formal trials and pilots prior to the scheduled 'transitioning' and 'relaunch' in January 2008.


Southwark, to their credit, expressed an interest in joining 'Wave 2' in 2006, rather than waiting for the 2008 rollout. The London Fire Brigade supported it, the Met supported it, the GLA supported it (and put ?250k into a pilot). But something happened.


In the first instance, nobody could work out who should run it. The police wouldn't do it, because their Metcall system wasn't finished (and now that it is finished, they still won't). And the inevitable cross-border issues (e.g. should Barnet pay for calls from Southwark commuters?). And financial issues (The Home Office stopped the funding). But then someone thought of a central switchboard.


So, by last September the pilot (in Barking and Waltham Forest) was up and running and had a favourable report. And the GLA was looking at a possible call-centre solution (which Ealing was already buying into). And in November Boris was promising to 'drive' the 101 project. But, in January, it was declared unfeasible. Except in Barking and Waltham Forest, naturally.. No reason is given, except a bit of mumbling about money.


So, although the public wants it, the infrastructure is in place and a lot of money has been spent, we're not getting it. Instead we've got the Met's shiny "you'll have to ring the council" number and the new "anti-social-behaviour-on-buses-but-presumably-not-trams" hotline.


Joined-up government in action.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> and not the

> thread to start a general heard it all before

> critique of the rights and wrongs of the war!


If you read it you will see that is not what was posted at all. The comment is about their just-now refusal to comply with an instruction from the lawfully appointed body that has told them to release the record of the meeting in which they committed to taking the United Kingdom to war.


Your line, of "Say what you like about TJ, at least she wants to make the buses run on time", is terribly appropriate of course, since I believe the original, "Say what you like about Hitler, he made the trains run on time" was one of the immortal sayings of a predecessor of TJ's chum, Sivio Berlusconi - namely one Benito Mussolini.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well that must make them the same then.


Not the same at all:


Barbara Castle

Gwyneth Dunwoody

Kate Hoey - for her recent record voting against the anti-civil liberties laws

what's-her-face Hackney MP, when she has a good day


The woman who is now leader of Green Party if only I could remember her name too


and the one from the Liberal Democrats who's always on Question Time. Sarah Teather. Actually I have no evidence for that but I'm willing to take a punt.


and - topic - I am sure they have all used buses at some point.

Tessa, I do hope this initiative lasts until next May when I presume Gordon will do an election bus tour...gratuoisly lying on a bus; talking bollox in a dour scottish accent; finding the thief who has ruined my pension and the country on the upper deck of a bus; etc etc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I recently had a utility room built, next to the kitchen. Dean Richards and his team carried out the works, they did a fantastic job. Thorough, with attention to every detail.  If you are considering an extension, refurbishment or renovation, Dean comes highly recommended.  Dean Richards  07888 651798  
    • Thanks to all for the comments and advice.  I have now reported the incident to the police.
    • Thanks everyone for your comments, all of which I’ve taken something from. I originally posted to warn and help others learn from my experience – hence the title, first and last words of the post. However, the process of posting and reading your comments has helped me better make sense of what felt ‘off’ about the incident, why and what I’d do differently next time. I hadn’t expected this outcome, so thank you.  It’s also yielded several ‘golden nugget’ insights, one of which I share here for others. For context, I’m a longtime SE22 resident, who lives on a street with a primary school, so am used to scooting, cycling, walking with buggies, small children, pets etc. I like where I live and have never been struck on a pavement by anyone, on wheels or otherwise. I’ve been fortunate. When walking down Carlton Avenue towards Dulwich Village yesterday, I was on the left-hand side of the pavement but – ‘golden nugget’ approaching – not as close to people’s front garden walls as I could have been. The cyclist came from behind and overtook on the inside i.e. passed between me and the wall. The gap was too narrow and he hit my leg. For clarity, my original post was about the lack of adult supervision of a child. There’s been much comment here about the cyclist’s age. I didn’t know he was 4, until his father told me. I felt that this was a tactic – along with telling me I was over-reacting, talking about intent, apologising undercut with ‘but’ and laughing – to downplay and avoid taking responsibility for his part in the situation. But I accept that is my perception, readers weren’t there and may think differently. What also felt ‘off’ is that the father didn’t see what happened or ask any questions to find out. What happened? Where did he hit you? How hard? Are you alright? Is my son alright? Is everyone alright? This sounds obvious but wasn’t to me until last night. Back to age. Is the age of the cyclist important? If you consider it from the perspective of a four-year-old, it might be. He’s on his bike, helmet on, speeding along, sees a gap and thinks he can get through it. He doesn’t know and/or may never have been told about the risks (to himself and others) of undertaking on the left. Hits pedestrian. I was not expecting to be hit from behind or the undertaking. But had I walked closer to the wall – and not left a potentially inviting gap – this probably wouldn’t have happened. This is just one ‘golden nugget’ I will take away. It’s something I can easily do, doesn’t depend on anyone else doing anything differently, and could contribute towards keeping myself and others safe. All in all, posting here has been unexpectedly useful for me. I hope for others, too. I feel able to move forward with learnings, so thank you guys.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...