Jump to content

Recommended Posts

keekybreeks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> i lose track of what i am supposed to find

> acceptable these days in the vibrant ED


> I can always lie & say I am bang into 80s hip hop & Northern Soul as a default if I have to keep face i spose



You can like whatever you want. But Mumford & Sons will always be godawful mobile-phone-advert shite.

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are you all sure none of you liked Mumford & Sons

> even a little bit when they started out? I find

> that surprising.




I like one of their songs. Don't know what it's called, but it's good. But I drove up to boro with a mate a while back and he played the first two albums the whole way. It made a very long trip absolutely awful.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> miga Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Are you all sure none of you liked Mumford &

> Sons

> > even a little bit when they started out? I find

> > that surprising.

>

>


you should have stuck on Chris Rea- his road to hell thang is about the A19


or maybe that isnt EDF dadster enough ?

>

> I like one of their songs. Don't know what it's

> called, but it's good. But I drove up to boro with

> a mate a while back and he played the first two

> albums the whole way. It made a very long trip

> absolutely awful.

I liked one Arcade Fire song (Ready To Start) and didn't mind one Mumford song (the one that goes "and I will change my ways"). I mean a good song is a good song - whether it's played by a Canadian in fancy dress, or a posh Englishman with a banjo. But neither band are really my bag.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I thought you would be proud of the Royal longevity and current ongoing links? being that your username was be-stowed upon him by the Anglo-Saxon royalty! 
    • Think I've likely over/misinterpreted this, but the line on " proud British person.. what side of the fence" struck me as a bit odd in relation to the Royal Family (or was it just the word Royal?). Whatever perspective you have on monarchy, I would have thought being skeptical/cynical about having our Royal Family in its current state is a perfectly legitimate "proud British" stance to have - all that taxpayers' money, profiting from our crumbling NHS, plus the challenge to proud democratic (waves around Magna Carta with patriotic pride/naivieté) norms like transparency and equality under the law..   On the post boxes themselves, afraid my own old-fashioned and nostalgic instincts kick in - I rather like them as one of our nation's benign historical legacies/quirks, without interpreting them as royalist bastions. I'll keep an eye out, just like I did for the Olympic gold ones.
    • Agree with Jenijenjen. Ultimately, water is an essential resource and a natural monopoly. It should be publicly owned imo. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...