Jump to content

Recommended Posts

keekybreeks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> i lose track of what i am supposed to find

> acceptable these days in the vibrant ED


> I can always lie & say I am bang into 80s hip hop & Northern Soul as a default if I have to keep face i spose



You can like whatever you want. But Mumford & Sons will always be godawful mobile-phone-advert shite.

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are you all sure none of you liked Mumford & Sons

> even a little bit when they started out? I find

> that surprising.




I like one of their songs. Don't know what it's called, but it's good. But I drove up to boro with a mate a while back and he played the first two albums the whole way. It made a very long trip absolutely awful.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> miga Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Are you all sure none of you liked Mumford &

> Sons

> > even a little bit when they started out? I find

> > that surprising.

>

>


you should have stuck on Chris Rea- his road to hell thang is about the A19


or maybe that isnt EDF dadster enough ?

>

> I like one of their songs. Don't know what it's

> called, but it's good. But I drove up to boro with

> a mate a while back and he played the first two

> albums the whole way. It made a very long trip

> absolutely awful.

I liked one Arcade Fire song (Ready To Start) and didn't mind one Mumford song (the one that goes "and I will change my ways"). I mean a good song is a good song - whether it's played by a Canadian in fancy dress, or a posh Englishman with a banjo. But neither band are really my bag.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Dunstans Road  comes under Dulwich Hill SNT- you can get their details on the Met Police website . I know that the Police are often patrolling Dawson Hights. Please contact them,
    • No one is arguing that people should cycle without lights or reflectors. Obviously they should. It is also a legal requirement. But the colour of someone’s clothing? Is it ok to wear navy? What about green? What shade? At what point should we have ‘no reason for sympathy’ if they’re in a collision? I don’t want people to feel like they need special clothes just to walk or cycle. If you have lights and reflectors and you’re on well lit city streets, there is no reason why drivers shouldn’t be able to see you, assuming of course, that they're driving with due care and attention. But yes, if there are lots of people without lights, that should be addressed. I suspect in part, it's the change over in seasons and the fact that people are getting caught out by how early it's getting dark now (obviously no excuse).
    • Found it but cannot contact owner as no email or message on it. e*****@icloud.com   please let me know if you’ve recently lost an Apple Watch SE
    • What a passionate thread this is. I have worked in cycling for years, am a cyclist, a driver, use public transport etc. Driving last night with my two young kids, who also cycle, we made the same observations. It was the kids who first asked me why are most cyclists wearing full black and no lights. We then played a game who can spot all the cyclists, and count those with lights and those without. This teaches them to look out for them but also not to put themselves in a position where we have to strain to find them. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...