Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Barking dogs at night in ED- why does everyone have a shouty greyhound/ whippet


Clean air- once upon a time, you could walk the bracing streets of SE22 ingesting a healthy amount of Lead and particulates- now everyone has a bloody wood burner, so the place smells like bonfire night


bloody friggin bleeding blow ins.etc


if they like country living so much, why dont they go and live there . at least cut out the bloody middleman of the Clapham-SE22-Whitstable cycle....


eh ? eh ?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/55399-where-did-it-all-go-wrong-in-ed/
Share on other sites

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> wood burners in London don't smell like Bonfire

> Night though, do they?

>

> not with that smokeless fuel crap they are obliged

> to use.



You should walk down my road on a chilly Winter's night, or a Summer evening numbers


Sydenham too is awash with smoke & outdoor grill aromatics


It's hell, but we are still 'Staffy' heavy with a light wippet contention making a show of late


I give it two years before we finally 'go to the dogs'

Of course Ot's right but generally, misplaced pronunciation aside perhaps, I'm on the side of the grammar feds. Nothing wrong with being gently persuaded to adopt proper usage.


Though if anyone could persuade a certain poster to use 'would have' or 'would've' or 'could have' or 'could've' instead of 'would of' or 'could of' then, for my money, they could split infinitives until the cows come slowly home.

Years ago a mate of mine posted on here. He's a bright bloke but can't spell for toffee, and some arsehole basically dismissed him completely on the basis that his spelling was bad, never mind the fact that he was making a valid point. Since then it's been a real pet hate of mine.


Although some grammar things do wind me up, but who REALLY gives a shit?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...