Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Barking dogs at night in ED- why does everyone have a shouty greyhound/ whippet


Clean air- once upon a time, you could walk the bracing streets of SE22 ingesting a healthy amount of Lead and particulates- now everyone has a bloody wood burner, so the place smells like bonfire night


bloody friggin bleeding blow ins.etc


if they like country living so much, why dont they go and live there . at least cut out the bloody middleman of the Clapham-SE22-Whitstable cycle....


eh ? eh ?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/55399-where-did-it-all-go-wrong-in-ed/
Share on other sites

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> wood burners in London don't smell like Bonfire

> Night though, do they?

>

> not with that smokeless fuel crap they are obliged

> to use.



You should walk down my road on a chilly Winter's night, or a Summer evening numbers


Sydenham too is awash with smoke & outdoor grill aromatics


It's hell, but we are still 'Staffy' heavy with a light wippet contention making a show of late


I give it two years before we finally 'go to the dogs'

Of course Ot's right but generally, misplaced pronunciation aside perhaps, I'm on the side of the grammar feds. Nothing wrong with being gently persuaded to adopt proper usage.


Though if anyone could persuade a certain poster to use 'would have' or 'would've' or 'could have' or 'could've' instead of 'would of' or 'could of' then, for my money, they could split infinitives until the cows come slowly home.

Years ago a mate of mine posted on here. He's a bright bloke but can't spell for toffee, and some arsehole basically dismissed him completely on the basis that his spelling was bad, never mind the fact that he was making a valid point. Since then it's been a real pet hate of mine.


Although some grammar things do wind me up, but who REALLY gives a shit?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Was it the two proxy votes that had swung it for Cllr McAsh in the first round? Interesting that he lost by two votes in the second. One wonders what the next move for Cllr McAsh is and whether the infighting will continue between the various factions within Southwark Labour?
    • Has anything emerged as to how the reported misinterpretation of rules ruling out proxy votes occurred, or what the specific fault was?  I've found and looked through https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Labour-group-model-standing-orders-2023.pdf, which afaics seems to be a prime relevant document.  It allows for local council Labour groups making minor amendments to cater for their council's particular form of organisation.  I've not seen any _explicit_ mention of proxy voting in the model SOs document itself.  I'm  attaching my notes on it.     re_Labour-Group-Model-SOs.txt
    • SMBs have the best organic porridge oats to make at home.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...