Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Blah don't get me wrong, unions can and do perform a crucial role in getting a fair deal for employees. I just don't get the relevance of a tie between a political party and a union. Whether we like it or not, perception leads many to not vote a certain way because all those stereotypes that are peddled in the media about socialism and being held to ransom etc stick in people's minds.


Louisa.

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blah Blah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Miga's failure was to fight Cameron on the

> economy from the off.

>

> I'll do it next time I promise. Greco-Roman

> wrestling should be appropriate.


sometimes i wish there was an upvote function on this forum!!!!

Louisa


Unless we agree to state funding of all political parties and ban donations it would be manifestly unworkable for the unions to stop supporting business.


And I don't think it is any less detrimental than the Conservatives being funded by big business. Simply self preservation by both groups.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I belong to a union Louisa, and it's affiliation

> with the Labour party is nothing to fear, really

> it isn't. Unions perform a very important role in

> making sure employees aren't totally screwed over.

> And as someone pointed out above, most of them are

> not run by firebrands. The work they do is

> important, most of which is amicable negotiation

> between employer and union. We don't have to go

> far back to see what a non unionised country was

> like. DO you really want a country where all

> parties are funded by corporations and bankers?


I'm a lapsed member - but after leaving jobs the company

I now work for (no unions) obviously aren't paying subs.


I still get cards and voting forms though - but if I made

it known where I am - they would not like it.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blah don't get me wrong, unions can and do perform

> a crucial role in getting a fair deal for

> employees. I just don't get the relevance of a tie

> between a political party and a union. Whether we

> like it or not, perception leads many to not vote

> a certain way because all those stereotypes that

> are peddled in the media about socialism and being

> held to ransom etc stick in people's minds.

>

> Louisa.


I always think beyond the soundbite and the frontman

when I vote - we're not a presidential system yet.

I like to look at the local candidate too.


Hope Nicola gives it to Cameron today mind - SNP seem

to be the main opposition at the moment.

A comment in a blog about the decline of the left-wing Social Democratic parties in Scandanavia and Austria caught my eye. It could easily apply to the Labour party here:


Even though the Austrian Social Democratic leadership understands all of this, they haven't been able to figure a way out of their dire situation. They have to triangulate between their immigrant base, their anti-immigrant working class base (including working class pensioners) and the left-liberal middle class base. Whatever they do, a majority of their own voters will be pissed off

From the second he threw his hat in there were plenty of people saying he's too london, and plenty pointing out that he went to (a really mediocre) Private school and is a millionaire.


Just don't think he'd have stood a chance.


Even though I'd have liked to have seen him do well.


I shall vote for a female leader I think.


I do like Andy Burnham, but think he might come across too old skool for many.

David, there's NOTHING bizarre about it!


See my earlier link posted about Chukka's problems...


From SKY News just now -


"A source close to Mr Umunna told Sky News the suggestion that his decision to withdraw was due to forthcoming negative stories in the press was "utter nonsense"."


Oh yeah, we'll see...

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > (a really mediocre) Private school

>

> St Dunstan's isn't Eton, but it's not mediocre...



You're right of course, it's a good school, but my point was basically when compared to Eton and the like it's not the same league.


I used to hang around with a few St Dunstan's lads, that speaks volumes.

"He was forced to apologise two years ago after it was revealed that he had once commented on a website that London?s nightclubs were ?full of trash and C-list wannabes?.


And he lives in a ?1million home reportedly funded from a family trust located in the tax haven of Jersey ? despite his party?s stance against tax avoidance.


Simon Danczuk, the outspoken Labour MP for Rochdale, had questioned Mr Umunna?s suitability for the role.


?Is he the sort of person who could win seats in Bolton West, in Bury North, in Glasgow?? he said on LBC Radio. ?Labour does need to move away from this metropolitan comfort zone. The party has been too London-centric.?


Two years ago Mr Umunna attracted ridicule when it emerged his Wikipedia entry had been altered to refer to him as ?the UK?s Barack Obama?. The change had come from a computer registered at his old law firm."


Personally, I would have thought that's enough embarrassing strikes against him before he even threw his hat into the ring.


I reckon Ed Ball's missus is the most likely winner - but there's so long to go to September, anything could happen.

Sorry David - just saw your post.


My point was that it's not bizarre that he should feel the pressure and stand down because of the new level of scrutiny. Given the aggro you get for allegedly calling someone a pleb, he was always going to come under some renewed level of fire for his alleged remarks made as "Harrison". Then there's the Jersey family trust etc. Arguably it might seem a bit difficult to lay into non-doms when there's a Jersey trust hanging about in the background.


Unless, you were referring to him standing in the first place knowing there would be such scrutiny, in which case I see your point completely and I agree.

No, I agree. It's just that if someone is capable of such gaffs/conduct, who knows what else is out there? There are other issues too. Maybe there is nothing, I suppose we may see on Sunday if there was anything imminent such as is being suggested by one reporter from the Times.

Here's a better piece on him from 2013.


http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/b2e9e3a6-ef46-11e2-bb27-00144feabdc0.html


And it includes this gem


"he became a chorister at Southwark Cathedral (I knew that bit already) ? his voice can be heard on the theme tune of Mr Bean. (That's the gold)



And so what if he said there was nowhere decent to go out at the weekend in central London. Everyone knows that.

I don't think it's his version of pleb, I think it's more like his version of "chav".


I am not defending his comment, it was arrogant and unwise (although it was made before he entered politics). But I know the sort of person I think he's talking about, and I wouldn't want to share a club / bar on a Saturday night with them either.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...