Jump to content

Protect Peckham's Future: art deco, cultural economy, & more


Recommended Posts

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you want a boring predictable safe sterilised

> high st try Lordship Lane, how can you have wasted

> a whole life shopping in a 'shithole' when what

> you were looking for is a mile away ?! lol



I thought we were talking about the space around the station? And the improvement


Perhaps you have a different perception of area.


For your information the only interest for me in LL are the diy shops.

It's only latterly that LL has achieved oh-so-covetable boring predictable safe sterilised status. It was perfectly acceptable ten or so years ago.


KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you want a boring predictable safe sterilised

> high st try Lordship Lane, how can you have wasted

> a whole life shopping in a 'shithole' when what

> you were looking for is a mile away ?! lol

Do we really want to create the same situation as Paris? A museum piece in the centre of the city, surrounded by perfectly preserved inner suburbs with wealthy families distorting the image of a diverse colourful population. Ethnic communities clustering around isolated outer suburbs hidden from national view and prevented from contributing to society. I have always love london because it is not that, it is a healthy mixture throughout the inner city. With social cleansing brought about in this way we will see inner london become a new paris. Very sad.

It's perfectly possible - and desirable - to preserve what's good as well as giving the area a good scrub. It is grubby (in parts) and to defend it in the name of "diversity" is to patronise and condescend. The area around the station is dark, dank and not worthy of the the ill-thought defence some people feel duty bound to offer.

It's true that lots of people shop there, but perhaps they don't have the time or money to travel further afield and might themselves want the grot-spots to be cleaned up.

And, just as a thought, why shouldn't things change? Areas change all the time, usually over the period of a generation, and it's inevitable that some will like it and some won't. Why should the current status-quo be pickled in aspic? That has never been the case for various parts of London at various times, so why should SE15 be special?

I realise we are in agreement, KK.


I tend to think it's social rather than ethnic cleansing, though; what might be considered aspects of white working-class life don't seem to fare too well either. All social classes have become more ethnically diverse, yet the affluent still give the less affluent a wide berth given a choice. Not sure I'm comfortable with using cleansing to describe this though, not least because of what it means in world history terms, but also because there's no conscious intent, it's mainly the outcome of lots of small choices at the individual level.


And I have to say, having mulled it over, I think dismissing the area as a 'shithole' is actually pretty f*cking rude to the people who live and work there.

I'll wade into this. I'll start by a broad brush everyone wants to fix and clean and the council's prime imperative is to build housing. But how to is reflected in the immediate vitriol of just 10 posts above.


ISIS has a fixed point in time we all have to conform to or die brutal deaths. We don't live that way. But cleaning and fixing a high street is complex and expensive. Peckham Vision has tried to find a balanced, well, vision. Peckham (and the whole of London)is a place with existing examples of built history covering at least 400 years.


Highlights of Art Deco, The Train Station and its extraordinary Waiting Room, examples of Industry and trains lines beg us to reclaim them as rebuilt and refurbished use or as new use by turning elevated train track into a skyline garden walk (cheaper and better and for everyone everyday use not the special interest public money garden bridge boondoggle).


And the sky line and sight lines from the centre of Peckham: Don't Build 30 story concrete rectangles on Morrison's Parking Lot and on the Canal Path


Come to the next Co-Design (which exists only because of Peckham's Vision).


Making History in real time with everyone included is very very complex that's why politicians rarely do it and the worst of them just exploit hate and fear and prejudice to simplistic cement the world over and exploit resources for the short term.


16th April 18:30 Peckham Co-Design All Saints Church Hall and you'll see what's happening. Knowledge does have the remarkable effect of knocking the wind out of sails and people riding high on horses to the ground (or tilting at windmills or expounding and pontificating from their armchairs)

I have to say, having looked at the Peckham Vision site, that they seem like they'd be an absolute nightmare to work with. Various demands to protect this piece of art-deco, that view, this arch, all backed up by some ill-defined, anti-capitalist concept of utopia in which everything will be better despite the fact that nothing will be allowed to change.


I'm all for preserving history, but the way to do that is to focus one's efforts whilst allowing some room for the future.

mynamehere Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'll wade into this. I'll start by a broad brush

> everyone wants to fix and clean and the council's

> prime imperative is to build housing. But how to

> is reflected in the immediate vitriol of just 10

> posts above.

>

> ISIS has a fixed point in time we all have to

> conform to or die brutal deaths. We don't live

> that way. But cleaning and fixing a high street is

> complex and expensive. Peckham Vision has tried

> to find a balanced, well, vision. Peckham (and

> the whole of London)is a place with existing

> examples of built history covering at least 400

> years.

>

> Highlights of Art Deco, The Train Station and its

> extraordinary Waiting Room, examples of Industry

> and trains lines beg us to reclaim them as rebuilt

> and refurbished use or as new use by turning

> elevated train track into a skyline garden walk

> (cheaper and better and for everyone everyday use

> not the special interest public money garden

> bridge boondoggle).

>

> And the sky line and sight lines from the centre

> of Peckham: Don't Build 30 story concrete

> rectangles on Morrison's Parking Lot and on the

> Canal Path

>

> Come to the next Co-Design (which exists only

> because of Peckham's Vision).

>

> Making History in real time with everyone included

> is very very complex that's why politicians rarely

> do it and the worst of them just exploit hate and

> fear and prejudice to simplistic cement the world

> over and exploit resources for the short term.

>

> 16th April 18:30 Peckham Co-Design All Saints

> Church Hall and you'll see what's happening.

> Knowledge does have the remarkable effect of

> knocking the wind out of sails and people riding

> high on horses to the ground (or tilting at

> windmills or expounding and pontificating from

> their armchairs)



I am labouring a point here but will phrase it as a question to keep it polite - How representative of Peckham demografics do your think such a meeting will be?



a) not very

b) very very

keekybreeks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> mynamehere Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'll wade into this. I'll start by a broad

> brush

> > everyone wants to fix and clean and the

> council's

> > prime imperative is to build housing. But how

> to

> > is reflected in the immediate vitriol of just

> 10

> > posts above.

> >

> > ISIS has a fixed point in time we all have to

> > conform to or die brutal deaths. We don't live

> > that way. But cleaning and fixing a high street

> is

> > complex and expensive. Peckham Vision has

> tried

> > to find a balanced, well, vision. Peckham (and

> > the whole of London)is a place with existing

> > examples of built history covering at least 400

> > years.

> >

> > Highlights of Art Deco, The Train Station and

> its

> > extraordinary Waiting Room, examples of

> Industry

> > and trains lines beg us to reclaim them as

> rebuilt

> > and refurbished use or as new use by turning

> > elevated train track into a skyline garden walk

> > (cheaper and better and for everyone everyday

> use

> > not the special interest public money garden

> > bridge boondoggle).

> >

> > And the sky line and sight lines from the

> centre

> > of Peckham: Don't Build 30 story concrete

> > rectangles on Morrison's Parking Lot and on the

> > Canal Path

> >

> > Come to the next Co-Design (which exists only

> > because of Peckham's Vision).

> >

> > Making History in real time with everyone

> included

> > is very very complex that's why politicians

> rarely

> > do it and the worst of them just exploit hate

> and

> > fear and prejudice to simplistic cement the

> world

> > over and exploit resources for the short term.

> >

> > 16th April 18:30 Peckham Co-Design All Saints

> > Church Hall and you'll see what's happening.

> > Knowledge does have the remarkable effect of

> > knocking the wind out of sails and people

> riding

> > high on horses to the ground (or tilting at

> > windmills or expounding and pontificating from

> > their armchairs)

>

>

> I am labouring a point here but will phrase it as

> a question to keep it polite - How representative

> of Peckham demografics do your think such a

> meeting will be?

>

>

> a) not very

> b) very very


Surely the point is though that anyone can attend that wants to and therefore show support/raise objections


I'm sure the EDF isn't the only place that this meeting is being advertised

Like most groupings of this ilk, a vocal, savvy educated, white middle class will articulate their views and their aims in a space they are familair with, where they can be most easily heard and most easily push their patronising views.



I ask again, who will turn up to this kind of meeting and get involved - and further ask - why is this so ?

keekybreeks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Like most groupings of this ilk, a vocal, savvy

> educated, white middle class will articulate their

> views and their aims in a space they are familair

> with, where they can be most easily heard and most

> easily push their patronising views.

>

>

> I ask again, who will turn up to this kind of

> meeting and get involved - and further ask - why

> is this so ?


What's a better, more inclusive way of going about it?

keekybreeks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Like most groupings of this ilk, a vocal, savvy

> educated, white middle class will articulate their

> views and their aims in a space they are familair

> with, where they can be most easily heard and most

> easily push their patronising views.

>

>

> I ask again, who will turn up to this kind of

> meeting and get involved - and further ask - why

> is this so ?



I totally agree with keekybreeks on this. I am not saying that any plans are bad (I don't really have an opinion), but it's a white middle class group trying to build a new Peckham in their own image.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Eh? That wasn't "my quote"! If you look at your post above,it is clearly a quote by Rockets! None of us have any  idea what a Corbyn led government during Covid would have been like. But do you seriously think it would have been worse than Johnson's self-serving performance? What you say about the swing of seats away from Labour in 2019 is true. But you have missed my point completely. The fact that Labour under Corbyn got more than ten million votes does not mean that Corbyn was "unelectable", does it? The present electoral system is bonkers, which is why a change is apparently on the cards. Anyway, it is pointless discussing this, because we are going round in circles. As for McCluskey, whatever the truth of that report, I can't see what it has to do with Corbyn?
    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...