Jump to content

Recommended Posts

i just wanted to say that I got an earful from my ex-housemate last Earth hour because I kept my light on, even though he left an average of four lights in our house (toilet, bathroom, kitchen & living room) on *all night, every night* for 6 months. He once told me a story abt a ghost who used to turn lights off in his old house, I just said "No it wasnt a ghost, it was ur mum"

Oh & i promise i'll use blackle from 8:30 onwards...

I'm going to flip the switch on the consumer unit, I am shutting down My Sony Vaio living room PC and getting ready to turn all electrical items off before hand be sure to power of everything if you flip you switch on the consumer unit otherwise you could blow a fuse when you turn it back on. Ive got 3 x laptops all batteries are charged and ready to go.

Forget giving up the cars. Looks like we'll have to go vegetarian:


While the Irish Republic and Denmark forge ahead with plans to introduce a "flatulence tax" on cattle ? much to the disgust of farmers in both countries ? UK farmers are bracing themselves for a similar move.

According to the United Nation's Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO), livestock is responsible for 18 per cent of the greenhouse gas emissions that are thought to contribute to climate change.


A cow emits as much as four tons of methane each year through burps and farts compared to 2.7 tons of carbon dioxide emitted by the average car.


The mooted tax of ?75 per cow would decimate the UK beef and dairy industry, which is already under strain from cheap milk and meat imports.


Farmers, however, are being encouraged to experiment with alternative diets to improve the digestive systems of their animals and stave off bovine flatulence ? and the accompanying tax.*


*The Telegraph

We did it too. Teenagers were grumbling but the younger ones found it very exciting with all the candles glowing. Made us think about how much electricity we normally use when we started turning everything back on again. Doubt the hour makes much difference but certainly raises awareness.

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Forget giving up the cars. Looks like we'll have

> to go vegetarian:


good point Peckhamrose... also, if not going vegetarian, try eating more chicken and less beef


to 'grow' one kilo of beef requires 11 kilos of food stuff

for pork it is 7 kilos to one kilo of edible meat

and for the dear old chicken...

two kilo of feed to result in one kilo of chicken


pretty obvious that being veggie (ie one kilo of veg = one kilo of veg!!) is the best option but hey, we're not all perfect

just do what you can


*adds [re]think to my list of reminders to self*


[re]claim, [re]create, [re]cycle, [re]duce, [re]make, [re]mind, [re]source and [re]use

spose its almost meaningless or deep as hell which way you want to look at it. Went to the british museum today, all the mummies and what not. As you go round you pick up on stuff like, incredible feats of mummification( how could they test that? with time?) and art and science and tools and thinking that has year tag further back in time from 'birth of christ' than we are ahead the other side of it yet. by at least a 1000 years. we are bitchin about earth hour. world resources, end of oil..

When you think about it global warming and the ensuing drop in population is just natural cycle of life.

A species is created, if it's successful enough it dominates its environment and expands its population, it requires more resources than that available to support its population and produces pollutants that restrict the ability of said environment to support it.


Population plummets until environment is capable of supporting species successfully again. Population increases to more sensible levels, but it will still overpopulate leading to a more moderate population crash, leading to a more sensible increase, etc, rinse and repeat until population finds equilibrium in about 8000 years time, assuming superior species hasn't wiped out planet with dangerous technology, or buggered off in pointy things with flames out the back.


Classic lifecycle; we are but bacteria in a petri dish, nothing to see here, move along (just glad I won't be around when the first and biggest crash begins).


Of course, all that said, we are blessed with intelligence and should be capable of breaking this, just all the evidence points at us being too selfish to do anything about it. The same reason why free markets won't solve anything, they positively rely on that selfishness!!

everyone is someone's kid charliecharlie.


But seriously, I don't think there's any room for complacency, I'm always banging the drum of the need for a seismic shift in the way we live our lives to prevent future catastrophe.


I'm merely pointing out that to a certain extent this is preordained on a macro level, it's simply the way life itself functions.


It's happened before to humanity, most populations in the world suffered catastrophic decline around the 15th century BC, probably down to climate changes, that's not to say that this one isn't man-made, it is, and not to say we can't do anything about it, though nooone knows if we've passed tipping point or not, and by the time we do, it will be too late of course.

[quote name=

Mockney Piers

everyone is someone's kid charliecharlie.


But seriously' date=' I don't think there's any room for complacency, I'm always banging the drum of the need for a seismic shift in the way we live our lives to prevent future catastrophe.


I'm merely pointing out that to a certain extent this is preordained on a macro level, it's simply the way life itself functions.]


yes... and you defined your viewpoint articulately and clearing... made for interesting reading


I was kinda teasing... but at the same time, was not talking about 'us'... ie. this generation, but 'them'... the next generation, our future

Surley you mean evolves MP over a period of millions of years. if not who is it created by?

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When you think about it global warming and the

> ensuing drop in population is just natural cycle

> of life.

> A species is created, if it's successful enough it

> dominates its environment and expands its

> population, it requires more resources than that

> available to support its population and produces

> pollutants that restrict the ability of said

> environment to support it.

>

> Population plummets until environment is capable

> of supporting species successfully again.

> Population increases to more sensible levels, but

> it will still overpopulate leading to a more

> moderate population crash, leading to a more

> sensible increase, etc, rinse and repeat until

> population finds equilibrium in about 8000 years

> time, assuming superior species hasn't wiped out

> planet with dangerous technology, or buggered off

> in pointy things with flames out the back.

>

> Classic lifecycle; we are but bacteria in a petri

> dish, nothing to see here, move along (just glad I

> won't be around when the first and biggest crash

> begins).

>

> Of course, all that said, we are blessed with

> intelligence and should be capable of breaking

> this, just all the evidence points at us being too

> selfish to do anything about it. The same reason

> why free markets won't solve anything, they

> positively rely on that selfishness!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Another great job from Leon - sorted a consumer unit and EICR for me last minute. Highly recommend 
    • Admin, please move this if it's in the wrong section. Can anybody recommend a reasonably local dietician (or possibly nutritionist? Not sure what the difference is). My GP has suggested I see a dietician, but there isn't one attached to the practice. I have googled, but it's very hard to tell what people may be like from an online description, and I want somebody who is properly qualified. Alternatively, please PM me if you know of people I should avoid! Thanks x
    • A vet might be able to trace its owners if it's chipped. Also I believe twb who posts on here has a mobile scanner. Poor cat.
    • If you look at the application linked to in the OP, you'll see it's a Licensing Act 2003 one, in this case for the purposes of sale by retail of alcohol and for the provision of late night refreshment: "TAKEAWAY COFFEE/ HOT SNACKS 2300-0100". IF the shop counts as a Hot Food Takeaway, then section P48 of the Southwark Plan https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Southwark Plan 2022 reduced 1.pdf , which appears to be the latest one linked to on Southwark's site, will I presume be applied in any  planning application (Is there one?). It says: "New hot food takeaways will only be permitted where: ..... 3. The proposed location is further than 400 metres from any existing or proposed primary or secondary school’s boundary; ....." It incorporates  policy laid down in the National Planning Policy Framework, and thence the London Plan.  Over the years KFC, and others, have taken a  number of appeals against local planning authority decisions on Takeaways to the Planning Inspectorate.  Some have been allowed.  KFCs 'commentary on evidence contained in London Plan Topic Paper: Hot Food Takeaways', https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/nlp_ad_91.pdf may be of interest to some. I'm guessing it's referring to https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/london_plan_topic_paper_on_hot_food_takeaways.pdf of 2018, but haven't yet checked.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...