Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe the price increase will encourage just a few

> people to give up a car. Or the second or third

> car? Job done

>

> Or maybe as with everything else prices go up. See

> also public transport price increases.


Sean, whilst I agree with you regarding 2nd and 3rd cars, for some a 1st or only car is a necessity.


This is revenue raising excerise and nothing more.


If the council were really interested in people giving up their additional vehicles then they would / should introduce a higher charge for the +1, +2 and so on.


p.s. I don't own a car.

ermmm... note what?


file.php?20,file=2927


Note that the council currently spends close to 10m on traffic issues, and motorists only deliver 1m in revenue?


Note that every council tax payer who DOESN'T drive, is paying for motorists?


Note that motorists are so vain that they think driving is a right?

Huguenot... we've had a similar discussion before. "Traffic Transport and Planning" covers more than just "services for motorists".


Plus, add in the fact that everyone needs roads for buses, taxis, post. Shops and businesses need the roads. And motorists of course pay additional taxes in the form of road tax, fuel, and sometimes congestion charge. So your stats - while relevant - are nowhere near detailed enough to draw the conclusions you have come to.

For sure, and I haven't mentioned the 'hidden' costs of motoring that aren't in my maths either. They seem to cost the planet, not a measly administration fee ;-)


I understand that [email protected] is responsible for communicating transport planning.


I think we should ask him!


I, of course, just have, and anticipate his detailed budget breakdown!

I would think everyone on here is pretty much aware of the environmental impact of motoring. That's not the point I'm making here though, I was only challenging your assumption that motorists are financially subsidised. In fact, the more I think about it, the more I think it's possible that it may be the other way round. Certainly when considered at a national level, rather than just the local council. I'm sure you will gleefully post the councillor's response - as if it somehow supports your conclusions - nonetheless!


It also seems rather simplistic to suggest that motorists are selfishly killing the planet. Not everyone lives in an area with extensive public transport such as London or Singapore (even better). Plenty of people live in areas where there are few other ways of getting around - and these are the people who rack up serious miles in their cars. What's being to provide alternatives and incentives for these people?

I agree with you, motoring is critical for some.


(As it happens I just don't think the same thing applies to ED, and I don't think it applies to most motorists. Apparently there are 60,000+ cars registered in Southwark and 37,000 cars come in each day with commuters. I reckon 'essential' would be lucky to cover 10,000 of them. The rest of them, well, you know.... easy innit. Just imagine what a beautiful, beautiful place Southwark would be if 9 in 10 cars simply didn't exist.)


The budget issue was addressing early posts in this thread that suggested that parking fee was profiteering, or racketeering. It would be a very poor racket that derives only 10% of outlay. I'd sack the Spiv.

I agree that too many people use their cars in London. I am very surprised that over 50% of Southwark's car owners use their car for daily commuting. I support the congestion charge, but am frustrated at years of under investment in public transport. If you want to get specific to ED : there is arguably a bit of spare capacity in the local train network, but not much. And instead of having services increased, they are actually being reduced. Not much of an incentive to ditch the car, is it?


Councils possibly could make a profit from parking fees (and fines) - but having some insight into the way local councils are ran, I seriously doubt they do!

Sorry Jeremy, my mistake.


The 37,000 cars are incoming to the borough from outside. They're additional to the 60,000 registered locally, and the God knows how many untaxed and unlicensed vehicles. When the rozzers did Oakhurst Grove a couple of years back they must have clamped a third of the cars.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Where did I say he did a good job? Yup and Corbyn was very close to Len McCluskey and funded by Unite wasn't he...they're all as bad as each other... Labour have to purge their party of the far-left - they're a disaster. Allan Johnson summed it up so well on election night in 2019....  
    • Thank you for the detailed advise @trinidad It is definitely damage we are concerned about. I don’t think Evri would agree to pay the bill to fix our gate or letter box if they were to be damaged as a result of their delivery drivers helper. Our doorbell can be heard from outside when rung so we don’t quite believe the aggressive simultaneous door/letter box banging is necessary. It can be quite a shock it is done very aggressively.  I’ll definitely action the steps you’ve kindly provided along with a phone call tomorrow. I do sympathise with the role drivers have and how busy they are, which is why we tried communicating directly with her but sadly we haven’t succeeded 
    • What outcome would you like? Disciplinary action? Not to have the driver back? Retraining? I know there is alot of pressure on drivers to deliver within a set day. if he slams the gate, is it evidence he is causing damage, or is the noise a irritant to yourself? You could put a sign up or buy a signing asking to close the gate gentle???? can you hear the door bell from the door? he might be ringing, not hearing and therefore knocking. In trhe notes section of the be livery page, there is a note section, although there is not 100 per cent these notes would be read as these drivers are constantly rushing.  I did a google search for you, i found this and you can try the envri website Contact Us | Evri   To complain to Evri, you can follow these steps: Contact Customer Service: Call Evri's customer service at 0330 808 5456 for assistance with your complaint.    1 Write a Letter: Address your complaint to Capitol House, 1 Capitol Close, Morley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS27 0WH.    1 Use the Official Website: Visit the Evri complaints page on their official website for detailed instructions on how to submit a complaint.    2 Email or Call for Specific Issues: For issues like missing or damaged parcels, you can email or call 0800 988 8888, which is free to call.    1 These methods will help you effectively communicate your concerns to Evri.   My driver is called anthony, he is brilliant to be honest. I cant fault him.
    • When I have more time and energy, I will look up the actual number of votes cast for each party in that election, rather than the number of seats won. I'm interested to see that you apparently  think that  Boris Johnson did a good job of "leading the country through Covid." Is your memory really that short? I won't stoop to calling Johnson and his cronies names in the way that you seem to think is appropriate for left wing politicians. At least the left wing politicians have some semblance of morals and a concern for people who aren't in some over privileged inner circle and/or raking in money for themselves on the back of an epidemic. I'm not going to open a can of worms on here  by commenting on the disgraceful so called "purge". 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...