Jump to content

Recommended Posts

aaagh, the right-who's-next-numpties, it's a rational rage but a HUUUUUGE ONE!!!!!


I do like to stand and drink at a bar, but if the queue is obviously 2 deep its time to take that drink elsewhere, if its just running out of room I usually grab the bar staff's attention for the punter in question.

Yes, it's enough to make a rat sick. Which reminds me, putting your hand over your mouth and pretending that you're going to be imminently violently sick as you lurch unsteadily towards the bar, usually, in my experience, clears a big space for you to get your order in. Works a treat.

Fat couples holding hands down the street and not giving way to passing traffic coming in the other direction. Thanks, I'll just kill myself then and walk out into the bloody road because your too selfish to let go of each for two stinking seconds or maybe consider going on a diet so I could at least squeeze past on the kerb? Pair of burger hungry ?&@%#.


Louisa.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag, do you shop at The Glades perchance?


I HAD to go yesterday, my Mac back up brain thingy gave up. So now have a new 2 TB brain thingy


Mind you, the old one lasted 7 whole years, so a visit in 2021 is pencilled in


Until then, NO NO NO



Actually, now my steam is building, i'll explain part of my ire


It's those pasty faced, pastel wearing Joey Essex wanna be's that "Hang-out" around the area. Blow in's from Kent and else where, with "Holister" and such sh!te and little Addidas bags and stuff like that. Girls with "the bunhair/eyebrow thing" going around in little groups, pasting faces with orange fake tan, drinking Frappe and cock like that.

God hell is THAT IT, is that what living is. And the idea that parents encourage it makes me weep.


But worst of all is, when they open their mouthes and speak "Are you on FaceBoooook"


Arhhhhggg I'm tempted to mow through the place in my pick up truck, only my vanity wouldn't allow it. To be known as the bloke who "Mowed through Brom-laaaaay" for the rest of my days, would be unbearable

Move back to Lewisham and improve your health then.


Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I completely agree.

>

> When we moved to Penge we crossed from LB Lewisham

> to LB Bromley, and just having the name on my

> council tax bill makes me feel a bit sick.

So ED is too snooty, Bromley is too chavvy, Peckham is too pretentious, Nunhead is a no-go area (although I like it myself)


Where would you all actually LIKE to live?


My first choice would be Brighton. But I guess you would find it too gay!


Something that has never bothered me at all & every restaurant/pub are extra veggie friendly.


As soon as I win the lottery I'll be there!

?Grow some balls?, ?grow a pair? etc. Stupid and really annoying for several reasons:


1 Bravey does not reside in the testicles;


2 Women can be just as brave as men, but find it really difficult to grow testicles;


3 It sounds sad and pathetic in an urban-warrior-pretending-to-be-macho sort of way.

It was on that thread about teenagers in the playground, when someone said they're there because it's a safe place for them. I suggested that they should grow a pair (or something similar) and broaden their horizons.


I stand by my general point, but the use of that term did me no favours.

That Barclays 'digital eagles' advert with the 'walking football for the over 50s'... Because, of course, everyone over 50 is a gibbering, stumbling idiot just waiting for the grave - and incapabale of setting up a Facebook page. What's worse is that 'walking football' is officially a 'thing' and not some tiresome fiction created by vacuous 20-something social media marketeers:


http://www.saga.co.uk/health/fitness/football-for-the-over-50s.aspx


Heavens preserve us.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...