Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Twirly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People who don't say "excuse me" or make any

> polite request when they need you to move, usually

> on the bus or train. They just shift around, give

> you a hard stare or trample you. What is wrong

> with asking? You're not going to burst into flames

> if you speak to another person in public you

> know!

>

> Myself, for responding to their fidgeting in lieu

> of a polite verbal request to get out of their

> way. I wish I could just sit and stare ahead of me

> and remain resolutely in their way until they are

> forced to actually ask. But I am far too polite

> (and English) for that. I shall have to get some

> blinkers for wearing on public transport. And then

> I get annoyed that they don't say thank you when I

> do move... grrr!



Were you, perchance, sitting on the outside aisle seat with a vacant window seat next to you requiring people to clamber over you to get to it?


That's a paddlin'!

Twirly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People who don't say "excuse me" or make any

> polite request when they need you to move, usually

> on the bus or train. They just shift around, give

> you a hard stare or trample you. What is wrong

> with asking? You're not going to burst into flames

> if you speak to another person in public you

> know!

>

> Myself, for responding to their fidgeting in lieu

> of a polite verbal request to get out of their

> way. I wish I could just sit and stare ahead of me

> and remain resolutely in their way until they are

> forced to actually ask. But I am far too polite

> (and English) for that. I shall have to get some

> blinkers for wearing on public transport. And then

> I get annoyed that they don't say thank you when I

> do move... grrr!


I so agree. I sometimes have to relieve my feelings with a sotto voce commentary as to a small child: 'Use your words', 'Say please', 'And now you say thank you' etc. Slight fear it may be less sotto than I think at times.

Eating on the train/bus/etc


It's not the act of eating, its more WHAT is eaten


On the train back from Victoria a couple were eating a Curry EACH


They had these huge litre pots of steaming gunk, and proceeded to stuff thier faces with it


I'm all for dining out BUT DO IT IN THE RIGHT PLACE


An i'd pay someone to blow that friggin West Cornwall Pastie shop up


*Ahem*

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Were you, perchance, sitting on the outside aisle

> seat with a vacant window seat next to you

> requiring people to clamber over you to get to

> it?

>

> That's a paddlin'!


Nope! I was on the outside. I had had to ask the chap to move his bag earlier to allow me to sit down on the particular occasion that prompted this post, but it's an extremely frequent occurrence these days.


And normally, when the window seat next to me becomes vacant, I scoot over to fill it, unless a) the next stop is mine b) I'm so laden down with bags that moving is not feasible. And even then I make sure that I catch the eye of anyone who might need a seat and make room for them to get in and sit down. Tis only polite after all.


Glad I'm not alone RPC. I tend to just give them a hard stare (to which they are impervious, usually). As for muttering less than sotto voce, I wouldn't worry as most of the time the offenders are wearing headphones anyway.

Twirly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I had had to ask the chap to move his bag earlier to allow me to sit down


People who put their crap on the seat in a busy commuter train REALLY annoy me. (But it's not really irrational rage... incredibly selfish behaviour).


We've probably already had this, but people who saying "I'm liking" or "I'm loving" something. Bullshit McDonalds Americanised rubbsih.

Twirly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People who don't say "excuse me" or make any

> polite request when they need you to move, usually

> on the bus or train.


I agree if it's on a bus, but on a train so long as I haven't dumped anything on the seat next to me (and I don't), I see no problem with leaving the window seat free ? you can just walk past me, which is not the case on a bus.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > CrossTown Doughnuts are better

>

> You tried Bread Ahead doughnuts from borough

> market?


I eat about 2 doughnuts a year, so they've got to be good


I raise your Bread Ahead with a St John bakery, custard side filled



And get with the programme Dopamine1979


CrossTown have pushed Krispy Kreme out of thier consession in Selfridges


It's a Peaky Blinders style Doughnut War, up the West End right now

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
    • So what do people want?  More housing.  More affordable housing.  But not in my back yard. That applies to urban areas too.  Easy to criticise, but where are your answers?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...