Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So come on great and inciteful DD please give me a rundown on who has been exposed as what cos i'm a bit thick and missed that bit. I got the bit about you exposing your attention seeking paranoia, but i'o a bit behind on everyone elses character flaws that you so cleverly exposed with your razor sharp insights.

Well Declan, you're just a low-down no-good son of a cunting m**herf**ker and I'm gonna round up my ED posse and we're gonna beat you upside the head in the manner of karate elvis


Except it's been quite a long day already, so maybe I'll let you off just the one time and hope you see the error of your ways


this might help

LegalEagle-ish Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So come on great and inciteful DD please give me

> a rundown on who has been exposed as what cos i'm

> a bit thick and missed that bit. I got the bit

> about you exposing your attention seeking

> paranoia, but i'o a bit behind on everyone elses

> character flaws that you so cleverly exposed with

> your razor sharp insights.



Im not trying to expose anyones flaws. Just saying that there are a group of bullies on here who find it worryingly challenging if anyone has the temerity to disagree with them. And most of them have seen fit to post on this thread. So we know who they are. Dont we Legal ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...