Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Lads, deep down we are esentially still little boys. We have that primal instinct to play with toys. What toys do you own that you still like to fiddle about/annoy people with. I play with:


Myself.

Remote controlled helicopter.

Air rifle.

Scalectrix.

Crossbow.

I chase wasps about with a small chainsaw I stole from a company I used to work for.

Firework occasionally.


Computer games don't count Sean and Mockney.


Over to you.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6034-boys-roomno-girls-allowed/
Share on other sites

though not strictly toys, i play with...


women, who enjoy the chase

the emotions of the weak and infirm

the hearts of young ladies, who know no better

the classic motor in the garage at weekends

poker, exceptionally badly



BBW, as much as they frustrate me, i have a deep-seated need to know more about them: we need the fairer sex. so have a heart and let 'em in puh-lease, there's no fun without them...

My toy collection is quite extensive thanks to my Son who has given me the opertunity to relive my childhood in so many ways.


Scalextric

Remote Control Plane petrol engine I dont fly it anymore so if you want it BBW it's yours.

Hotweels cars the boy has a massive collection

Robosapian great little remote robot

5 remote control cars the boy and I race in the car park

A Johnny Seven. Never had one as a kid.

I used to go to the toy shop in Waterloo station, and it was there displayed in the main window.

At four pounds nineteen and sixpence though it was out of the question.

We weren't poor exactly but my folks didn't have four pounds nineteen and sixpence-worth of expendable income to invest in leisure/play hardware.

And of course expendable income and leisure/play hardware hadn't yet been invented.

And of course 'investing' wasn't for the likes of us.

Knew our place we did.

Waterloo Road it was.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Annasfield Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Pft

> >

> > Am mean with a crossbow.

>

>

> Me too - a compact and chichi little weapon,

> perfect for the ladies - real men should acquit

> themselves impressively with a long bow


I'm directing a long bow in your direction as we speak RosieH.

So far bent over from the waist am I that I don't think it's in my imagination that I can hear vertebrae snapping.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *walks in*

>

> Considering the lack of ladies this place of

> surprisingly full of tits.

>

> I?m off for a skate.


Ladies? No sign at all last time I looked.

But chicks, birds and tarts? Sure the place is stiff with them.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> With summer coming, my super soaker will be coming

> out.


It just requires a hyaaa hyaaa hyaaaaa at the end of that post to confirm that the spirit of the late Sid James has found a host in our own Keef.


Wish I could get mine to go off, I keep pulling the trigger but all I get is drips.


See Keef, I'm being Bernard Breslaw so I am.

Along a similar line to HonaloochieB's earlier post, we couldn't afford very many cool things when I was a kid, so I'm doing my best to make up for it now. :)


So far I've spoiled myself with:

A remote control helicopter

An air gun (although pathetically weak)

And - my personal favourite - I'm building up a pretty good collection of Superman comics.


The younger version of me would be so jealous...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...