Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The mind boggles - I walk past it every day - a classic motor. It does move tho, now and then as it changes its direction and the flats seem to every now and then get fixed. I think its owner obviously has 'money' and I think he/she just uses it every now and then in the country for some off roading. I don't see what the problem is with it being an eyesore - if its taxed and insured then it has every right of being where it is - not like those Chelsea tractors that park illegally outside schools every bloody morning. Huh!
It has no tax, it should be stored off road as it has a SORN tax status. It has not moved at all since before Christmas when the back tyre went completely flat. ourbubbleonline, maybe we could get it towed to sit outside your house for 12 months or so - you might get a bit sick of looking at it too?
Ok if you'll pay the bill get it towed outside my house! Wouldn't bother me as I live off the road and have a 6ft wall meaning I wouldn't have to see it until i leave the house - not that it would really bother me as its a bloody car on the road, where cars should be - its not that big a deal, there are more important things in life to worry about! And it has moved since Christmas for your info as I walk past it every day and ADMIRE its beautiful presence, a piece of British history, a car that is no longer in production. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2449593/Land-Rover-Defender-cease-production-2015.html- LOL. Hilerious - TOUCHE!!!!
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...