Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well first I'd like to stop him from having full-on sex with the bankers five nights a week B)


This whole 'heads we win tails you lose' lark is now beyond a joke. If banks are failing, let them fail, and stop bailing them out and putting us in hock for ever after. There will never be enough money to bail out all the failers. Admit it now.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/#findComment-194481
Share on other sites

Hmmm - so far it's easy pot shots and an easy target, although I'm mostly with Louisiana on an emotional level


Now that the banks have (mostly) been stabilised it's easy to say that money has been wasted, but history has yet to make a judgement. My gut feel is that, agaisnt gut instinct, it may have been teh right thing to do..


But the budget is about what happens next. Tomorrow the reviews will be in and various factions will be decrying X and Y - I'm just curious as to what people are thinking before then

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/#findComment-194482
Share on other sites

Politicians are like Monkeys........the further up the tree they climb, the more they expose parts of themselves that you would not rather see.....


Budget, Smudget...we're heading for a 1930's Recession and we will have to grin and bear it, untilthe good times return...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/#findComment-194484
Share on other sites

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm - so far it's easy pot shots and an easy

> target, although I'm mostly with Louisiana on an

> emotional level


It's not emotional. It's factual.

From the NY Times this week:



With the global economic downturn deepening and confidence in the financial system still elusive, the International Monetary Fund estimates that banks and other financial institutions face aggregate losses of $4.1 trillion in the value of their holdings as a result of the crisis. In its global financial stability report, released Tuesday, the fund estimated that financial institutions would have to write down an estimated $2.7 trillion in loans and securities originating in the United States from 2007 to 2010. That estimate is up from $2.2 trillion in the fund?s report in January, and $1.4 trillion last October. The financial crisis "is likely to be deep and long lasting," the report said, noting that global financial stability has deteriorated further since its October report, especially in emerging markets, particularly in Europe, where banks face more write-downs and may require fresh equity, even as businesses seek to refinance debt.


--------------------------


In other words, there is more to come. I could point you to many other similar published opinions in mainstream press.


The US may be through the worst of sub-prime, but what about ARMs? That saga has only just begun.

And unfortunately our banks and building societies are equally exposed... In Europe, we are the most similar to the US market.




>

> Now that the banks have (mostly) been stabilised


??


> it's easy to say that money has been wasted, but

> history has yet to make a judgement. My gut feel

> is that, agaisnt gut instinct, it may have been

> teh right thing to do..

>


Unfortunately we now have many financial institutions classed as 'too big to fail'. So the govt bails them out and then the country's debt classification falls through the floor and nobody wants the debt our government issues.

Here's hoping we don't end up in a basket-case Iceland situation, but...



> But the budget is about what happens next.


The budget is about paying our way. If the government is loading us with more debt for every future day, that diminishes our ability to pay our way every year from now.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/#findComment-194488
Share on other sites

the money wasn't there it wasn't real it was digital and based on companies and especially FS companies inflated balance sheets based on 'assets' that have largely been proved toxic. Basivcally 'we' the world, and us in the UK especially, have to get used to the fact that our wallets are about 30% lighter than we thought.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/#findComment-194498
Share on other sites

It is it is, but equally there are a lot of unknown factors as well. And that is the dilemma any chancellor finds him/herself in on a day like today. A lot of facts are available. A lot of arguments and opinion. If everything is as screwed as some people believe then he should just put his feet up and say "ah just leave it as it is"


But back in the real world where things matter and it's not possible to just say "politicians - load of bloody idiots out for themselves" there is a balance to be struck surely?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/#findComment-194510
Share on other sites

AD should acknowledge there is thing thing called climate change (and acknowledge that post-IEA 2008 autumn report things have really moved on and it's no longer sensible for the UK civil service to trot out the same old platitudes) and reflect this in government financial planning, plus incentives, penalties etc. Tinkering at the edges is just not good enough.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/#findComment-194539
Share on other sites

Agreed again


The thing that gives me hope (and I admit it is exactly the same thing that could, viewed differently, make me jump off a cliff) is this...


I don't have to listen to any of the gloomy forecasts anymore. or at least, I don't have to take them seriously. The "expert forecasting" is a busted flush. They don't really know.. so I don't have to listen to them

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/#findComment-194546
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...