Jump to content

Sweary Sean


Jamma

Recommended Posts

In today's utterly stupid 'bloody nappy valley' thread Sean McGabhan called another poster a fuckwit. And in response to a fairly sensible comment. That seems to break the rules on a few counts as far as I can see. Yet no action was taken. Are there different rules for different people?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

SeanMacGabhann has been sent a warning, and I can confirm that there are not rules for different people. I am only aware of these things when people bring them to my attention, thank you for bringing this to my attention.


I an now going to add fuckwits to the list of censored words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But as I understand it Sean is an administrator. He's taken down one of my posts in the past which was far more innocuous than some of his recent comments. If he can't police himself should he be allowed to police others?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ah Jamma bless you - rather than click on the report button you started a thread. Duly noted


In my (lame) defence when I typed the swearword I assumed the swear-filter would automatically **** the words it has in the past - I assumed wrong


As for the nature of my post what's you problem - someone registers and posts for the first time to explicitly called other people stupid with no foundation - and you consider that "sensible comment"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, I missed this too - what was the word, what was the word?


Can I say tit? I thought the guy was being a bit of a tit, so not sure if Sean's word was worse than that. I have relied many times on the swear filter to change my words (although typed what I actually meant) and think that if it didn't do it automatically, I too would have had a warning by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't want to report the message. The word did not offend me particularly, I know and use much worse words on a daily basis. I am simply interested in fairness, even-handedness, justice one might call it.


I didn't think the person in question was being a (insert swearword of choice here) but if I did - and there are plenty of times when people on here say things that I think are really dumb - I would just ignore it rather than call them something designed to wound, humiliate or offend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jamma, how did you know that SM sometimes dons the cape and mask of Administrator?

I have absolutely no idea who is or isn't, and assumed it was some sort of masonic duo who operated from the spire over the top of the MIND shop at Goose Green.


Seriously how did you know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

macroban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> At one stage, albeit briefly, the admin/mods were

> listed on-site.


Their secret identities revealed?

Well I'm glad that was stopped, from a comic book superhero point of view, it breaks every rule in the (comic) book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ah Jamma bless you - rather than click on the

> report button you started a thread. Duly noted

>

> In my (lame) defence when I typed the swearword I

> assumed the swear-filter would automatically ****

> the words it has in the past - I assumed wrong

>

> As for the nature of my post what's you problem -

> someone registers and posts for the first time to

> explicitly called other people stupid with no

> foundation - and you consider that "sensible

> comment"?



Hello all. I'm the one that Sean reacted to yesterday. It's me who should be apologising. It was my first post (although I've registered previously and not specifically for that thread) and my intention was to have some fun. It was a wind up. I'm sorry it's caused this fuss.


Thanks for your concern as to my welcome forumites. Fortunately I'm old enough and ugly enough to take a bit of stick. I'll try to keep future posts more constructive but will find it hard not to do the odd bit of leg pulling.


Cheers Silverfox

Link to comment
Share on other sites

silverfox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hello all. I'm the one that Sean reacted to

> yesterday. It's me who should be apologising. It

> was my first post (although I've registered

> previously and not specifically for that thread)

> and my intention was to have some fun. It was a

> wind up. I'm sorry it's caused this fuss.

>

> Thanks for your concern as to my welcome

> forumites. Fortunately I'm old enough and ugly

> enough to take a bit of stick. I'll try to keep

> future posts more constructive but will find it

> hard not to do the odd bit of leg pulling.

>

> Cheers Silverfox


Welcome Sil, may I call you Sil? You don't seem like a f@ckwit at all.

Please stick around and get involved and if there's a leg within arm's reach don't hesitate to give it a tug.

Now SM, you make kissy-face with SilverFox.

Go on.

Go on.

Go on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does 'covered in glory - not' mean? I made my point, it was never anything personal and you conceded a few days ago that it was 'not unfair'. End of.

Now you go all Waynesworld on my ass with a petty and personal dig. I can't understand under what circumstances writing 'covered in glory-not' would seem like a big or clever thing to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It was an absolute shit show. And so much anger coming from both sides, not becoming at all (was surprised how riled cool Rishi was getting).  Agree about the format, it was lazy, whatsherchops wasn't asking pertinent questions, she was just going for binary yesses or nos. The producers didn't force either side to drill down on anything, just make commitments so they got good soundbites.  If I hear 'my father was a tool maker' / my wife's a nurse / my father was a GP one more time... as if any of those things qualify anyone to fix / understand anything. 
    • Good.  Subsidence claims generally have an excess of £1000 per claim, but was yours higher?
    • Indeed, many house here have had or will have subsidence issues so one needs to bear that in mind.  Many houses here have shallow foundations but they have been around 100 years or so without too much issue. What the surveyor has told you doesn't feel like a 'red flag', more of a sensible warning.  Bear in mind that although the surveyor is nominally working for you, their focus iln reality is mostly on the lender and the risk of being sued, either by them or you.  So they are always pretty cautious.  It would be wise to get a 2nd opinion, eg. from a structural engineer.  Or talk  to the original surveyor directly as they may say more than they are prepared to put in a report.  It's a little difficult from the description to identify what the situation is but the scenario in which part of a property has been underpinned and the rest has not is fairly common here.  The proximity of trees is likely to be the main thing to be concerned about, particularly after the hot summer of 2002, as insurers generally regard them as risky, especially if they are not cut back from time to time.  A second surveyor can advise directly on this. It would definitely be worth trying to take over the current buildings insurance.  Indeed, it may be quite hard to find new cover.  Enquire what the current premium is and who the policy is ultiimately underwitten by (ie. is it a name that you have ever heard of?)  The insurance industry, in general, works to a guideline that the insurance of an underpinned property should transfer to a new owner.   https://www.biba.org.uk/insurance-guides/home-insurance-guides/subsidence/
    • More than the 2 contestants, the format and production was the main fault last night - allowing 45 seconds for an answer will get you those responses from any 2 candidates Awful show
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...