Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is an appeal to reinstate Louisa.


Louisa Date Registered: 26/02/2007 3,493 posts..


Louisa has been here for over 8 years..

I do not know the details of the offensive post that got Louisa 'banned' / banished to the Lounge.


I think she has served her sentence and would like to ask the moderators to reconsider their decision to ban her.


She has over the years added value to the forum and is witty, funny with posts that some have misinterpreted..


There are others here whose posts are of a more personal and insulting nature than Louisa's posts.


I urge others here to also give our Lou. another chance.


DulwichFox

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/61566-appeal-to-reinstate-louisa/
Share on other sites

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How's it done? Love to get some tips from those

> who've managed it.


Try repeating the same old meaningless rubbish on every thread ad nauseam, regardless of topic. And also start a few new threads specifically for this purpose.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ...or if you don't want to get banned, just repeat the above process but just point out every so

> often that you're a blow in from somewhere posh. Admin won't touch you with a barge-pole.


Well, that certainly helps your case.

Dulwich Fox wrote:


"I urge others here to also give our Lou. another chance."


Ok - fair enough.



Louisa then wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

"...or if you don't want to get banned, just repeat the above process but just point out every so

often that you're a blow in from somewhere posh. Admin won't touch you with a barge-pole."


Oh.

I can't see it stopping. Only today news comes in to me that is ripe material for a Louisa/Fox gentrification bore-off thread. They won't be able to resist more gastorification debate (clue btw) of a well worn locals haunt that neither of them have actually been into for years....


Just change the record?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • BBC News - Deputy PM David Lammy set to announce jury trial reforms - BBC News https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg1q62jmv0o
    • It’s literal.  There are levels of earners. Those who don’t work and get benefits, those who work and get benefits, those who work but don’t get benefits. now, it’s an assumption that the last group are all wealthy, but that’s not the case. People in this last group are most exposed.. private rent, higher tax brackets, cost of living increases, yet they pay the most tax, and get no help.    So many questions: why are workers needing to be subsidised? Should companies pay more? Should there be private rent caps?  Why are people better off not working at all, or only working low hours to ensure they get benefits top ups?  How do you think people respond to this?     Do you realise that a number of companies are focussing on buying property? The banks, the supermarkets! Yet the government is squeezing individuals out of this equation. What do you think this will look like in the future? When foreign companies own the majority of UK property?
    • All depends on what you call reasonably priced!  Was it for Christmas Day?   Noticed that The Plough were advertising Christmas Lunches but did not see any prices listed.  
    • A few weeks back, I booked an appointment by phone, not the app, which surely must be the same process as booking it at reception? Though it was for a longer appointment than usual, so maybe that was why?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...