Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Let's face it, the new owners, whoever they are, will be concentrating on food, that's the one thing we all know. From my experience, pubs that concentrate on food tend to be gastropubs. They are aimed at a certain demographic. The same happened with the FHT (the rose). Most old customers didn't return. Why can't we just have one or two pubs left where it's all about drinking and not bloody eating. If I wanna eat I do it at home or in a restaurant. Not in a pub.


Louisa.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Re: The White Horse. Hogie has decided to leave

> and sell up after 33 years. He ran a fine old

> school boozer. His son is going to run another pub

> in the area and he'll be part of that. I like the

> pub, especially for Hank Dog's Easycome music

> nights on Wednesday. It's that club that I'm more

> concerned about as it will possibly have to move.

> Recently, I've enjoyed sets in there from people

> like Dave Mankind, The Petrels, Misty Miller and

> her brother Rufus, a couple of members of Fat

> White Family (Saul and Lias) and another local

> legend Flameproof Moth. So it's not all old farts

> in there. I'm hoping that the new owners can

> create a decent mix of old and new and keep

> everyone happy.


Maybe the Easycome could move back to the Ivy House?

Not enough people go out to pubs just to drink any more to make them financially viable, drinking out is just too expensive and fewer people do it.


Easier in busy areas for drinking holes to survive but there are few "locals" that can make that work any more. That culture started to change many years ago, it's not a new thing. Was in Paris last weekend and was reminded how much I like their caf? culture where people go out together and some eat, some don't, some booze, some don't.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's the point Sue. It's a pub, not a

> restaurant. It's not trying to gain a Michelin

> star.

>



"It currently does one of the best roast dinners in the area". That's what you said :)


My point was, it doesn't :)

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Was in Paris last weekend and was reminded how much I like

> their caf? culture where people go out together

> and some eat, some don't, some booze, some don't.


TBH doesn't sound a million miles from a lot of pubs these days.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why do Pubs rely on selling food to make ends

> meet...?

>

> ...and Restaurants rely on selling alcohol.. ?

>

> DulwichFox



Simple answer: because either way you need the sum of both to survive. That's why pubs that just sell bitter with a few peanuts in a bowl on the bar have gone the way of the plague, rag and bone men and trams.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Foxy don't you remember the tram lines on dog

> kennel hill?

>

> Louisa.



I did not move to East Dulwich till 1980. I'm actually a blow-in.. First Phase.


By 1952 trams had already been phased out in several English cities but some of London's old trams were sent to Leeds where they remained in service until 1959.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/july/6/newsid_2963000/2963092.stm


The lines may still of been there till later but I don't remember them.


Foxy

So how does the castle (never dead, not overly expensive compared to local competition) survive then?


And likewise Fox's on Kirkdale (same owners).


Both of these feel old skool without feeling like you're likely to get glassed IMO.


Guess it's just a case of everywhere else changing so they got all the drinkers. I'm also told (but have no.intention of checking) that the Legion on Barry Road is doing a roaring trade, at least on Sundays.

Absolutely agree Otta. As so many old style pubs close, the customers look elsewhere for the same offering. The few surviving old time boozers will be thriving in a few years from now.


I still miss the Oglander (not it's later restaurant incarnation). George, Joey and Eric sat in the corner of the public bar, with tales about the war. Roasties on the bar with smiths crisps a plenty. The castle reminds me of those times.


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have had multiple jobs completed at my home by T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, and I wouldn't go to anyone else now. They always come at the agreed day/time, I have never been asked to rearrange. The jobs have always been completed to extremely high standards, and as a perfectionist myself, I appreciate this level of care and detail. I'm grateful of the clear up afterward too, leaving me very little to do after the job is done. I am always blown away by the speed and efficiency  - no waffle, no flannel, just sheer hard work from start to finish. In summary - a highly professional first class service. Don't hesitate to call T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, if you like excellence and trade people that will respect your home. 
    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...