Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My first post was around October or November 2006. At the very beginning you could post without registering, and there was no Lounge.


Perhaps unsurprisingly my first post was about pub crawls.


El Pibe was here slightly before me. StraferJack came a few months later (both with different names).


I was Keef but don't remember my row with Lou.

Joined in February 2007, first posted in May 2007 - a blow-in from the SE1 Forum. Now I think about it, have been amazingly lucky to find two great local forums (fora?) in the places I've lived in London.


The first person I met 'in real' was Michael Palaeologus (who sold me a coffee table and was lovely with it).


Definitely would be up for 10th anniversary drinks.

Just had a read back over those early posts ruffers provided the link to.


Great to see DulwichMum and Quaywe posts. Also, one of the unregistered early *Bob* sarcasm bombs. Something about someone jumbling the same 8 words and comparing it to making a conversation with a fruit machine? Snorks in the early years before it all got out of hand too.


Life.


Louisa.

So the front page looked like this 9 years ago -



Subject

Important: Vote for the best bar/pub in East Dulwich.

Lordship lane shop gossip

!!!New!!! www.Myspace.com/eastdulwich

Wireless Internet Spot

Fish and Chip shop on Northcross road

Italian restaurants (lack thereof)

Turning right from East Dulwich Road onto Forest Hill Rd

The best Sunday lunch in Dulwich?

Why is Dulwich the poor relation?

East Dulwich property prices

street lights in the SE15/SE22 area

Gun Crime finds ED

Women only sessions at the Dulwich Leisure Centre pool

Government Pulls plug on new boys school for 2007

Car Boot Sales near East Dulwich

East Dulwich Cat Owners

Pub quizes in East Dulwich (near Barry Rd)

Goose Green Consultation - East Dulwich

About East Dulwich Forum

Graffiti in Dulwich


Plus ca change..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...