Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think there should be a statue of Emily Pankhurst in Trafalgur Square. Women should be represented properly in society. We are not all chocolate, shoes, and bags,. Lots of us still want equal footing with men, and wages.We all dont want to be silly cows who just want to be used by men and get drunk like them. drinking beer. Pathetic.Skinhead children no doubt. "Shall I get my nails done" "Shall I get a nose piercing" or shall I have another tatoo". Or shall I feed my kids;descisions oh dear. where did it all go wrong.?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6219-what-happened-to-real-women/
Share on other sites

woofmarkthedog Wrote:


> Don't worry tomorrow's Saturday, or if your

> reading this on Saturday yesterday was Friday &

> tomorrow's Sunday

>

yes but then it's monday :( i really need to get a job I don't hate.


Morag, do you consider yourself to be a real woman? I don't know if i'm a real woman or not but i think i'm alright.

Morag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well doctor, she would be someone who would ask

> you."What do you think is a real man?


Thats not so much an answer as a question, all i can ascertain from this is that real women ask questions when asked a question.


"What do I think is a real man ?"


In my professional opinion, I'd have to say Chuck Norris.

Mikecg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> PM me you picture and a brief bio Sophie and I'll

> confirm it for you, please include the relevant

> measurments.



Oh MIKECIGGIE.....



YOU PREDATORY W***RDO......errrrr w e i r d o...he must be back on the "lash"



W**F



*tut's quietly*

'Real' women disapeared from public view when Margaret Thatcher was ousted in 90, after that (1991) they became 'All Woman' for this we can thank Lisa Stansfield, who coincidentally had to change the lyrics of All Woman to remove reference to Maggie T.


It is indeed a strange world in which we live.

woofmarkthedog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mikecg Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > PM me you picture and a brief bio Sophie and

> I'll

> > confirm it for you, please include the relevant

> > measurments.

>

>

> Oh MIKECIGGIE.....

>

>

> YOU PREDATORY W***RDO......errrrr w e i r d

> o...he must be back on the "lash"

>

>

> W**F

>

>

> *tut's quietly*



Oh woofy me old mucka and I thought you were dead!

First place to look is the Wisden of real women, FHM. Caprice and Holly Valance should slug it out for the title of woman of the millennium, preferably in a vat of butter.


Barring that a statue of Felicity Kendall on the plinth?


I've heard much tell of Ms Stansfield that would turn your postmans hair grey overnight! What ever happened to?

I can?t say I can comment precisely on what makes a ?real? woman but I think it has something to do with biology.


But an admirable woman to whom many others would do well to aspire to I would say is one who doesn?t define herself by how she appears to men. Or women for that matter.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
    • "PGC, do you reckon this 'Anderson -Tendulkar' series could make Tests a bit more interesting to the wider word?" Alas no. Until it comes back to terrestial telly, I think it will always suffer from elitism(?).  Excepting The Guardian, cricket is barely mentioned in other press. I am fortunate in that my daughter has just added me to her subscription on NOW TV. It has been great to watch this test; it really could have gone either way, eariler in the day, which always makes it more exciting. The only bugbear is that I am a TMS afficianado, and they are about eight deliveries ahead of the tv! I thought Tongue was excellent in mopping up the tailenders, and Duckett was a delight to watch. Bumrah and Jadeja were brilliant to see. I'm sure the Edgbaston crowd will have tremendous supporters for both sides. PS: I don't think Jofra will be back on the strength of one county wicket.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...