Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,


Did anyone see the car crash early Saturday morning? It was opposite Somerfields with three badly damaged vehicles. One vehicle ended up in the outside seating area of the restaurant. All vehicles were near write off's . The bizzy's were there and quite a queue of rubber-neckers (must be from Crystal Palace)


Remains of shattered screens, oil etc. are still visible. Because no-one posted this crash I thought that it might have been a film set with the cast and crew nipping off for breakfasts.


Regards,

Libra Carr.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6409-car-crash-lordship-lane/
Share on other sites

I might have been wandering past early that morning - just to prove it wasn't part of Libras imagination! In terms of leaving evidence, they did a great job of clearing it up quickly, but you'll notice Le Chardon is currently missing half of it's front railings!


http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3646/3565535273_1e668d6cc6.jpg?v=0


http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3366/3565535179_d743120503.jpg?v=0


http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3369/3565535081_01f1b5d0d7.jpg?v=0

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Erm, what is this if it isn't rubber necking,

> albeit of an altogether more digital nature?

>

> Odd, very very odd.


I can understand why you think this is odd (I think you mean slightly shameful), but this is no different to the pictures in newspapers or on TV news. We can be supplied with all the info we need in writing or verbally, but we have a basic human desire to use our eyes. In fact what you see here is a little bit of citizen journalism, bypassing the South London Press or the BBC. I guarantee you'll be seeing a lot more of this kind of thing in the coming years. So what you see here isn't "odd", it's the future.

Vince Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> RosieH Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Erm, what is this if it isn't rubber necking,

> > albeit of an altogether more digital nature?

> >

> > Odd, very very odd.

>

> I can understand why you think this is odd (I

> think you mean slightly shameful), but this is no

> different to the pictures in newspapers or on TV

> news. We can be supplied with all the info we need

> in writing or verbally, but we have a basic human

> desire to use our eyes. In fact what you see here

> is a little bit of citizen journalism, bypassing

> the South London Press or the BBC. I guarantee

> you'll be seeing a lot more of this kind of thing

> in the coming years. So what you see here isn't

> "odd", it's the future.



Surely you should be using your ability to see 'the future' and heading down to LL to try and prevent this event from actually happening?

Bic Basher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm surprised this hasn't been mentioned already,

> there was a crash involving a convertible and a 12

> Bendy Bus on Lordship Lane at the junction of

> Friern Road on Sunday afternoon.



it was and this one too see earlier posts

I'm down with the whole citizen journalism thing - why only last year I did a whole story on it (some years after the fact).


However, what I can't get away from the is the sense of repugnance I feel at someone's stopping to take several pictures of a car crash and posting them online for others' sport. Similarly a post commenting on the rubber necking of passers-by, followed by a commendation for the posting of crash pictures online.


It isn't the future, it's human nature. Just an ugly part that I'd just as soon have no dealings with. Hence I will leave you folks to your ghoulishness and seek entertainment elsewhere.

Bic Basher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm surprised this hasn't been mentioned already,

> there was a crash involving a convertible and a 12

> Bendy Bus on Lordship Lane at the junction of

> Friern Road on Sunday afternoon.


Um, it was mentioned May 25th, third post on this thread. By me.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Hence I will leave you folks to your

> ghoulishness and seek entertainment elsewhere.


That's completely fair enough. If you're uncomfortable with a publication, don't read it. I don't buy the Sun for a similar reason. But this thread is News. Small-time News admittedly, but news I'm interested in because it's happening just round the corner from me. And I appreciate the fact that someone's volunteered to take and post a photo so I can see what's been going on. Thanks Nutty, by the way.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It shouldn't be a difficult DIY job. Replacement cylinders are available here are a couple  https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/236294046742  https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/177388193151 What is the make and model of your chair?? Unless its a Herman Miller then its worth fixing but some other may not be worth it.
    • Returning to the question, although still not directly answering I'm afraid as ive not lived on that road: I have previously lived in a house where the railway line was behind the house and over a playing field, and also in a flat blocked from the railway line by at least one more block worth of houses. I would not live that close to a railway line again. In the house the noise with the windows open always disturbed me at night. And you need to bear it mind it is not just the timetables of passenger trains you need to consider, at night time there could be freight trains too. That was my problem in the flat: not noise, I was shielded from that, but the weight of the freight trains passing made the whole building shake enough to wake me up. If you are a sounder sleeper or less sensitive to noise it could be fine. I would suggest checking if freight trains use that route though.
    • Thanks TWB, that is all really useful. However, if  memory serves, The Fox Project actually directed me to The Fox Angels when I phoned them, and had no facilities in this area for sending anybody out themselves. They seem to be based in Tunbridge Wells. The Greenwich Wildlife Network also just suggests other organisations who may help in certain situations. To the best of my knowledge, however, for situations involving foxes, including injured or ill  foxes, Fox Angels are the only people who have someone available very locally who can come out virtually immediately (I waited maybe half an hour after I phoned them). The person who came had all the necessary equipment to move the fox, was very gentle and caring, and took the fox to a local vet (it sadly died). It's possible that if you phoned a local vet they would help, if you could get the fox there. The RSPCA has guidelines on what to do if you find an  animal in need,  however although they have recently had a campaign on this (and sent me a badge and a copy of the guidelines on a pocket sized card) I can't find them online. I attach a photo. Don't know if the QR code would work from a photo.    
    • My mum (91 years young!) well remembers going to Austin's as a child, which she described as an 'Aladdin's Cave'!  She absolutely loved it - and is still a shopping fiend to this day (I 'blame' Austin's 😉). Going back up Peckham Rye, passing Austin's on your right hand-side, just past Phillips Walk (so not far from Austin's at all), I believe there was a British Relay Wireless shop - this would have been in the late 1930s/early 1940s.  Does anyone know anything about this? My grandad (my mum's dad) used to manage it; it was severely damaged in The Blitz - but I am having trouble locating it.  Mum's memory is dim (she was 6 at the time); she originally thought it was in Rye Lane, but we think now it was in Peckham Rye just up from Phillips Walk (originally Phillips Road). 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...