Jump to content

Recommended Posts

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Or Mikecg's spelling.


Can you picture the headlines? I'll help you through it.


BREAKING NEWS!!!


Today history was made as the first man in history has been arrested on the charge of poor spelling. Today police officers of the Met's newly formed grammar unit arrested a man in south east London and also seized his computer. Sentencing was swift as the judge took no pleasure in handing the defendant a copy of lines to be copied 5000 times and if done incorectly he would have to do them all over again. The defendant has reportedly made an appeal to the courts of human justice but it was rejected on the grounds that they couldn't make head or tail of what he was on about. Senior detectives some with over 30 years on the job spoke of the utter barbarity in which the defendant had abused our rich and diverse language. Speaking outside of court detective inspector Wolf played down claims that the law lords were thinking of imposing custodial sentences on these scum. "No we wont be reverting back to the days of the spelling Nazi's who followed a policy of mass extermination as that would be a step back in the ongoing crusade against thickies", "what we want to do is rehabilitate them back into intelligent society through a structured programme of Fuzz buzz and Biff n Chips books not label them as outsiders". "I'm also very glad that operation Typo was a complete success and congratulate my officers in their dedication of my new units baptism of fire case".


A woman who goes by the name KalamityKel was also taken into custody in relation to the charges above but was later released as she'd only been using text speak in which the only person who is harmed is the person who uses it.

buggie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> .... would be a bit of a random thing to make up

> wouldn't it??

>

> Looking at the number of views/posts there are per

> day don't think the forum is needing to stoop to

> that.


It was just a fleeting thought - I'm sure you're right.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andrew whatshisname's lawyer might find it useful as his client has just been arrested "over the alleged sharing of confidential material". The arrest of Mandelson to follow?
    • That's the milquetoast triangulation that's delivered so much electoral success to the Lib Dems locally and nationally! 🤣
    • Amazing. Now could you cut and paste an AI summary of the defence case for Andrew M-W? 
    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...