Jump to content

Recommended Posts

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Or Mikecg's spelling.


Can you picture the headlines? I'll help you through it.


BREAKING NEWS!!!


Today history was made as the first man in history has been arrested on the charge of poor spelling. Today police officers of the Met's newly formed grammar unit arrested a man in south east London and also seized his computer. Sentencing was swift as the judge took no pleasure in handing the defendant a copy of lines to be copied 5000 times and if done incorectly he would have to do them all over again. The defendant has reportedly made an appeal to the courts of human justice but it was rejected on the grounds that they couldn't make head or tail of what he was on about. Senior detectives some with over 30 years on the job spoke of the utter barbarity in which the defendant had abused our rich and diverse language. Speaking outside of court detective inspector Wolf played down claims that the law lords were thinking of imposing custodial sentences on these scum. "No we wont be reverting back to the days of the spelling Nazi's who followed a policy of mass extermination as that would be a step back in the ongoing crusade against thickies", "what we want to do is rehabilitate them back into intelligent society through a structured programme of Fuzz buzz and Biff n Chips books not label them as outsiders". "I'm also very glad that operation Typo was a complete success and congratulate my officers in their dedication of my new units baptism of fire case".


A woman who goes by the name KalamityKel was also taken into custody in relation to the charges above but was later released as she'd only been using text speak in which the only person who is harmed is the person who uses it.

buggie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> .... would be a bit of a random thing to make up

> wouldn't it??

>

> Looking at the number of views/posts there are per

> day don't think the forum is needing to stoop to

> that.


It was just a fleeting thought - I'm sure you're right.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sure - but to describe one councillor's hissy fit as a "fury" unrivalled by hell is a bit of an overstatement. Cllr Barber's attempt to hijack the moment by blaming austerity on Labour instead of the Lib Dem-Tory coalition is an amusing fumble too. It would have been better to keep quiet and enjoy the spectacle of Labour and ex-Labour councillors bickering. Labour is well-known for its ability to sustain internal catfights for years, if not decades!
    • Yes,  but as you said "at last" you had found a good reason not to vote for the greens, I wondered why you would want one. Plus it seemed (to me, at least) a very strange reason and didn't seem to have anything to do with the party's policies.
    • I also had a good experience with Andy, he was quick to respond and came out to resolve the issue at short notice. He was friendly and worked hard to find a solution to the problem with my tap which is now working like new again.
    • No, I clearly quoted you in my response; did you miss that? It’s obviously AI generated: any reasonable human being would be too ashamed to spin such arrant twadle.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...