Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So this is something I have been pondering for a while, but wouldn't know how to prove one way or the other.


Do you think it's possible to manufacture a colour that doesn't exist in nature?


I used to think yes, but now I suspect no and don't know how to come to a satisfactory (though inevitably not definitive) conclusion.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6478-dulux-versus-gaia/
Share on other sites

Hmmm well I once read about some scientists in Teddington had created the world's blackest black. It is essentially the absence of light and useful for certain scientific processes. As far as I'm aware it does not occur naturally due to the existence of light throughout the natural world.


I'm on my iPhone at the mo so can't link or hunt for the source of this but maybe someone else could.

Not a scientist but ...... here goes.


1. All colour is a function of light.


2. Light can be refracted to create a spectrum of colours


3. That spectrum of colours provides every combination of colour that can ever be created - tho' some may not be present in any other form than the spectrum of light.


4. So YES nature got there first.


Doesn't the New Scientist have a question and answer column that could answer this?

Well I thought this about light and the spectrum of colours, but then you get into metallics and fluorescents, and they don't exist in the spectrum, I don't think, do they? Maybe they do. Or maybe they're not officially colours.


MM, you're quite right about New Scientist - I should have thought of it before (although to be fair, while I have been contemplating this for a while, it's never been with any real ferocity). I shall send them a missive toot sweet.

Bellenden Belle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I found a link about Teddington's blackest black

>

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2732487.stm


This isn't black it's very very very very very very very very very very very dark blue.

It wouldn't do for priest's socks.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you think it's possible to manufacture a colour

> that doesn't exist in nature?


Can natural processes produce all possible colours?


Colour corresponds to electromagnetic wavelength. The electromagnetic spectrum is (believed to be) continuous therefore resolves to an infinite range of pure colours.


Electromagnetic radiation is (usually) produced in steps corresponding to the energy transition levels of certain types of sub-atomic particles (leptons). It could be argued that only a finite number of steps are possible. In which case, nature could not produce all possible pure colours.


However, in an expanding universe, the Doppler effect can bridge the gaps between any finite steps. Synchrotron radiation produces a similar effect. Therefore, our universe (according to our best understanding) is capable of generating a continuous electromagnetic spectrum of infinite resolution or, in plain English, an infinite range of pure colours.


Whether all the possible pure colours exist, or have existed, or will come to exist, can only be determined probabilistically, I would suggest.


> I used to think yes, but now I suspect no and

> don't know how to come to a satisfactory (though

> inevitably not definitive) conclusion.


As for mixtures of pure colours ? the probabilities are mind numbing. The number of pure colour mixtures exceeds the number of atoms in the observable universe by a very wide margin. I?ll leave you to decide whether you were/are right or wrong :)

[???? quote=I think *Bob* and CharlieCharlie are your actual Forum experts on colour

]



Well Rosie, it all depends on what you mean by 'exist in nature'... if you mean 'as seen by the human eye', then yes, manufacturers can match it, they now have highly complex scanners and software systems that can detect and copy micro variations in colour difference.


If you mean 'as found in the natural world' (and again the definition of 'natural' is complex) ie plants, minerals, fauna, the elements etc. then it becomes more tricky... synthetic or chemical dyes and pigments can create 'unnatural' colours, ie day-go, fluorescent and what we call 'flip' in the trade, ie colours that appear to be totally different depending on the angle you view them from. The colour industry has invented all sort of 'special effect colours' which can not be found in the natural world, but can, however, be recognised by the human eye. For example, you could have a fluorescent, flip, metallic gloss...


Then there is the thermochromic group which change colour depending on temperature, so are not constant. And to top it all, the metameric impact on colour (ie the fact that two colour samples on different sub-straights, may appear to be identical in one light source, but appear not to match at all in another type of light), makes defining and matching a colour problematic.

RosieH Wrote:

>

> Do you think it's possible to manufacture a colour

> that doesn't exist in nature?

>


I haven't a clue but this Synthetic chemical turns out to mimic molecule in body, causing unwanted death (the latter bit being my laywoman's interpretation) seems to tell us that we should adopt a little more caution before having fun with man-made chemicals and gaily adding them to everyday substances. Whether as colour or scent.


Should you choose to click and read the article - Chemical Xenobiotics and Mitochondrial Autoantigens in Primary Biliary Cirrhosis: Identification of Antibodies against a Common Environmental, Cosmetic, and Food Additive, 2-Octynoic Acid 1 - you will see that some fairly sensible researchers believe this 2-Octynoic Acid, invented to give a lovely lemony=limey scent and added with merry disregard for human life to all kinds of stuff that we slap onto or into our bodies, turns out to mimic a molecule that already existed in nature - in the cells on the lining of our bile ducts (bile - lemony/limey colour). Unfortunately this has a tendency to confuse the immune system which sadly in the course of getting rid of the synthetic chemical, destroys the bile ducts as well, causing a truly life ruining illness followed by death - faster or slower. I couldn't give you a definite vote for the slow death over the fast one. Either way, it cannot be described as a bundle of fun.


Don't know about Dulux v Gaia specifically, but in chemical manufacturers v human race, I have known a number of losers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Staff get taxis in and out and get paid extra (which I think is x2). Some people like to work on Bank Holidays and others don’t. Some people actively avoid Christmas for personal reasons. Long live freedom of choice! 
    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...